• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

6mm Creedmoor first elk hunt

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can you direct me to this data?

Here are a few examples!


80 grain .224 ELDM for deer - 24HOURCAMPFIRE

Dec 6, 2024Haven't tried the 80, but have killed several animals with the 75 gr ELDM at 22-250 speeds. I WAS NOT impressed and don't use them anymore, I found very erratic performance on the 15 or so animals I used them on, to include WT, hogs of various sizes, and pronghorn.

A friend of mine just bought a Fierce Carbon Fury in 6.5 CM. The round they verified to 1000 yards was 147 gr ELD Match factory ammunition. He's a little concerned about using this as a hunting round, have any of you guys taken any big game animals with this round? Thanks for any comments.
I've taken two bulls with 147 ELDM's, one just under 400 yards the other past 800.
The 400 yard shot was very explosive but it just made it to the lungs for a good kill, the entrance wound was the size of a huge grapefruit.
The longer shot was right behind the shoulder and it also didn't penetrate deeply.
One piece of the fragmented bullet clipped a lung, I had to hunt him down for a follow up shot.
They're super accurate but I don't recommend them for big game after my experiences


We found the 147 ELDM , from the PRC to work very well past 500 yards on antelope. But he 2 deer we shot under 400 did die quickly, but the bullet placed broadside in the crease was so explosive it ruptured the diaphragm on both, blew open the stomach, and soaked the tenderloins and hams in orange acid stomach fluids. So I am not a fan after having to clean my meat with a baking soda solution. This was from a 5 groove 8 twist tube.

I fear than with so many 4 groove 7 and 7.5 twist barrels out there now, there are going to be some wrecks from the fast twist, high velocity, deep jacket inscription (3 and 4 groove) and super thin jacket of the ELD M along with the tip to start expansion. This could be the perfect storm

about the two elk shot at the same time, both equally a little far back. The 30 cal heavy elk never went anywhere, the 6.5 elk was stalked for a long ways to get a finishing shot in.

To be clear, I am not saying the 147 ELD M didn't kill. They did and they did it quickly with totally destroyed vitals, both with perfectly placed shots. But when I do my part to place a shot perfect, and I get the mess on the meat of a gut shot, I choose to move on.

For longer pokes they were great, for closer shots, they didn't steal my heart


from what I experienced shooting a big buck with 123 eldm at 3k fps at 325 yards, I would say it was similar to what broz experienced with his two deer at close range and a fast shooting ELDM. it definitely kills them stone dead, but you are also likely to cause a mess, and that bothers some people more than others. It's just something to weight into your bullet decision


I have seen quick kills with them at 525 from a PRC and 700 from a CM. The thing that has made me leave the bullet for now has been blow ups from my PRC. It is only an 8 twist

Saw this on a fb page. 6.5 prc and 147 ELD M. 30 yards. Shooter thinks it is awesome. I disagree. This is the entrance showing it was fully expanded on the hide. Be careful friends. I am going to predict some train wrecks with ELD M's and high velocity impacts


This was just a brief search, most being larger calibers than the 6mm.

Many of these folks experienced "blow ups" at longer ranges when heavy muscle or bone was encountered…..a high velocity impact hitting bone/heavy muscle will only exacerbate the "blow-up" possibilities. Also, the majority of the stuff that I saw was from deer/antelope shots…..not elk. The size of the elk alone can require more from a bullet.

As I mentioned before……a bullet placed behind the shoulder, into the lungs will do the job. Anything beyond the aforementioned shot placement can have unwanted consequences.

These unwanted consequences may not be important for someone living in elk country, having the opportunity to hunt them every year. But, is this caliber/bullet good advice for someone that may only have one chance to hunt an elk?

So, not only do I recommend a bullet better designed for a less than perfect shot……but, also a larger diameter bullet! memtb
 
What a pitiful ******* site. We've seen this on so many culling trips, where some ******* fudd brought his ultra-magnum whatever he couldn't shoot well with a bullet that marketing convinced him was the best.
I am curious what point are you trying to make regarding the comparison video? Both shots were broadside, both were good shots, both killed the Elk in one shot. Completely different bullet construction, same outcome, dead Elk, in this shot opportunity. I didn't see a fudd with an ultra-magnum that couldn't shoot in these videos, maybe I missed something?

@257Tony did a great job finding those vids. It would be really interesting to see if he could use his search skills to find a similar comparison where the shot is steeply quartering to and steeply quartering away in order to get a full picture in this terminal bullet comparison.
 
There are points to be made all around here. One thing we can come together on I think is the common sense of the shooter doing due diligence to understand the parameters of his abilities, his target (animal), and his equipment - bullet included. If he is capable of hitting the "target" effectively at 800 yds, say, is his bullet still operating within it's effective design (or field proven) parameters in terms of velocity, construction, etc to reach the applicable level of penetration and tissue damage to reliably terminate "target" function. I think we are seeing the same elephant from different angles but still the same elephant. All in good fun methinks. 🤠
 
Actually, I did complete HS. However, a HS Diploma or a college degree can't give you common sense. Some here fail to reach the minimal standards for common sense!
Just because it's "common"…. doesn't mean it makes sense!

The whole "energy transfer" Wive's Tale is a great example of this. It's common, but not correct.
 
I am curious what point are you trying to make regarding the comparison video? Both shots were broadside, both were good shots, both killed the Elk in one shot. Completely different bullet construction, same outcome, dead Elk, in this shot opportunity. I didn't see a fudd with an ultra-magnum that couldn't shoot in these videos, maybe I missed something?

@257Tony did a great job finding those vids. It would be really interesting to see if he could use his search skills to find a similar comparison where the shot is steeply quartering to and steeply quartering away in order to get a full picture in this terminal bullet comparison.
you are correct, both elk died, and if the shooter/hunter achieved the result they wanted that is perfect. it is funny how others try and force their desired results onto others. Some want an exit, some want all energy expended in the target, It is up to the individual to pick the combination that works for them. The bottom line is, know your and your equipment limitations, apply your good ethics, and stay within those limits and you will have good results.
 
Just because it's "common"…. doesn't mean it makes sense!

The whole "energy transfer" Wive's Tale is a great example of this. It's common, but not correct.
Show us an example of you killing an elk or any other critter without transferring energy. This entire thread is about if a 6 creedmoor has an appropriate amount of energy available to be used for elk hunting.
 
Show us an example of you killing an elk or any other critter without transferring energy. This entire thread is about if a 6 creedmoor has an appropriate amount of energy available to be used for elk hunting.
Energy is not "transferred"…. nor is it a measurement of killing ability.

KE is an expression of an object in motion's potential to do Work. How that work is done (on the animal) has less to do with the amount of KE, and more to do with the integrity of the projectile, and the object's Momentum.

It's Physics…. not "common sense".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top