30-378 vs 300 rum

loaded to the same pressure in the same barrel length of at say 28" , my guess would be 75-100 fps. But my vote would be for the 300 RUM simply cause the brass is half the cost and last twice as long. The extra 100fps maybe 150fps isin't going to make that big of a differance to the critter or the wind.
 
In barrel length under 28" it will not be much more then 100 fps if that when both are loaded to 65,000 psi with that weight bullet.

Also consider that the norma cases will not last all that long with this level of pressure so you may see the advantage be even less when considering long case life as a criteria for the loads as well.

In 26" barrels, I have seen some 300 RUMS match what a 30-378 will get. Others will be from 50 to 100 fps slower.

In long barrels with bullets of 200 grains and heavier, the 30-378 will have an advantage but then you just get a wildcat like my 300 Allen Xpress which is based on the Lapua case and you will match anything the 30-378 can do and do so with long case life.

Kirby Allen(50)
 
I'm not sure if the soft norma brass is the tricky issue as it will probably tell you when you go over 65k. It's the remington I'd worry about when it might not show you anything till you are at 72-75K!!?? A constant diet of that is probably being consumed in alot of 300 rums' out there.
 
Kraky,

A 300 RUM primer will let loose driving a 200 gr bullet to just over 3200 fps, or at least loosening to the point its really noticable, This is well below the safety limits of any modern receiver designed to be chambered in the RUM chamberings.

I can assure you that a +70,000 psi load will in most cases deprime your cases for you with any brass I have seen yet except the Lapua 338 Lapua case. Other then that I do not know of a case that will take that kind of pressure and not show dramatic primer pocket loosening.

Again, if you were running +70,000 psi with the RUM cases, you would be getting one firing per case.

Kirby Allen(50)
 
Kirby....you are THE EXPERT HERE on this forum and I wouldn't normally disagree with you about pressure and cases. I'm not sure if you have ever met or heard of Stan Watson. He is a really credible ballistician. He wrote a book called "The Handloaders Odyssey" where he pushes a 30-06 to the max with tons of different loads, primers ,temperatures, seat depth....you name it. He did all his testing with a strain gauge. He had plenty of brass that showed signs of pressure under 70k. He also had brass on loads that only showed extractor marks at 73k. AND in some other testing he had "one lot of brass that showed nothing at pressures approaching 80k" His bottom line is "no brass that I've encountered shows any signs of pressure until the pressures are "very" excessive."
And, the funny thing is he didn't use any fancy brass like Lapua or Norma.....almost all brass was winchester and rem brass.
I do believe with all the wildcatting you've done you must have done alot of work with strain gauges or maybe a better system but I found everything in Stans book really credible and very much like what I have found pushing my own 30-06's.
Maybe you can tell us more specifics on you experience pushing the RUM??? (not trying to be a smart alec here....just willing to learn.....and learn....and learn.
 
I am by no means an internal ballistics expert by any means but I have read many studies and tests about the topic and can tell you a couple things.

First off, the smaller the head diameter of a round, the higher chamber pressure it will handle with a given brass quality.

By that I mean that if you take three cases, a 223 Rem, a 30-06 and a 300 RUM, all made with the same alloy brass, with the same case head hardness and the same case wall thicknesses, in most cases, the 223 will handle more pressure before showing pressure signs then the other two larger cases.

From what I understand, its a simple function of square inches and cubic inches in relationship with the PSI.

Here is another example, take a round, any round, does not matter which and shoot it in a rifle with a firing pin and hole in the 0.060" range. YOu will easily be able to take that cartridge and load it up to VERY high pressures possibly even +70,000 psi before you see any primer cratering around the firing pin.

Take the same rifle, enlarge the firing pin hole and firing pin diameter to say 0.070" and you will see primer cratering at much lower pressures, from what I have seen and read, I would say around 55 to 60,000 psi you will see primer cratering around the firing pin.

Take that rifle and enlarge the firing pin to 0.075" to 0.080" which is not to uncommon with some factory rifles such as Win M70s and you will get primer cratering at any pressure.

So why the difference, its simply because the area over the firing pin is basically unsupported and as that area increases, it gets more difficult for the primer cup to withstand the pressure because there is more area that is unsupported.

It is similiar with the cartridge case itself. In a 223, it can be nearly impossible to read pressure signs until its really to late.

As the case diameter increases it becomes easier to read the pressure because the larger head diameter will create more bolt thrust at lower pressures and you will start seeing pressure signs such as extractor marks, cratered primers and heavier bolt lift.

Comparing a 223 with a 30-06 is nto a good comparision, comparing a 30-06 to a 300 RUM is an even worse comparision, apples and oranges. I can assure you that there is no RUM cases out there today that will handle 70K psi and keep a tight primer pocket.

The reason I say this is because I have read pressure data on this round and from all the ballistic data I have read, if your pushing close to or over 3400 fps in a 26-27" barrel with a 180 gr conventional bullet, you are pushing very close to the 70k psi range and your primer pockets will loosen.

Another thing to keep in mind is a theory known as "detonation". I have read and heard lectures about this condition and basically what the thinking behind this is is that when the internal pressure reaches a certain point, generally thought to be between 72 and 75K psi, whatever remaining powder that is in the case/barrel will burn almost instantly which will result in a severe pressure spike.

This is a relatively new idea that has been being studied and the reason is because it has only been the last 10-15 years that we have had the correct powders to see this problem.

In most cases, there is so little powder left in the barrel when this pressure is reached that you see very little if any pressure spike. With rounds such as the 06 based and even most belted magnums, there just is not enough powder remaining to see a real issue when this is thought to occur.

Now, with the rounds such as the RUMs and the big Wby and some of the big Wildcats we are playing with, it is thought to happen much more often. The reason, is because we have powders such as H-50BMG, Vhita Vouri 20N29, WC860 and WC872 that we can load in very large capacity rounds.

In past days you may have only a couple gains of unburnt powder when the internal pressures reach this point of Detonation. Now, you may have many times that amount and when it happen you see the primers being blown out of the cases, not loosened, blown out!! These are the ones that fall out of the case when you eject a case.

Many top internal ballistic experts believe in this theory, some do not but it does make alot of sense. Anyone that has pushed a large capacity round to its limits have seen instances where some cases do not show any real excessive pressure while others have leaky primer pockets. This is what is believed to be the reason for that.

Back to the 300 RUM. I will admit that the Federal 300 RUM cases are harder in the case head then the Rem cases and would likely take more pressure but I have tested both of these brands of brass in several 300 RUMS with barrels in the 26 to 28" range and all have topped out in the 3350 to 3400 fps range with absolute max loads, that being where the primer pockets begin to loosen with a single firing.

Loading the 300 RUM to the same head expansion seen on factory ammo will get you around 3250 fps with a 180 gr pill. In pressure barrels, the factory testing has proven that the 300 RUM will push slightly over 3300 fps at remain in the 65,000 psi pressure limits at normal shooting conditions.

Again, not to be disrespectful of Mr. Watsons tests with the 30-06 but I am sure if you asked him he would tell you the same thing, that a comparision between a 300 RUM and a 30-06 would be nearly meaningless as far as top end pressure limits.

If you understand and believe the theory of Detonation, his claims that he was getting near 80,000 psi would raise some questions with no pressure signs but I have never read a test of any kind using conventionally designed rifles that would allow the use of 80,000 psi with no pressure signs on the case.

Its funny you bring up "fancy" brass from Norma and Lapua. First off, if you want soft brass that will let loose early with pressure, get some Norma cases. I believe there is a reason Wby uses norma cases. Yes they are very good quality cases but I have on many cases seen once fired factory Wby cases that had primer pockets nearly to loose to reload!!! This was in a 300 Wby. We shot those loads over a chrono and I believe that they clocked just over 3200 fps with a 180 gr bullet. 3230 fps if I recall correctly.

We took some Rem cases and matched that easily and were able to get 3-4 good firings per case with matching performance levels whereas the Norma cases were done after two firings.

Lapua cases, yep, they are stout. If there is a case out there that may take 80,000 psi my guess would be the 338 Lapua case from Lapua. I have used this case on many of my personal wildcats and driven it HARD. I have yet to loosen a primer pocket on a 338 Lapua case and again, I have pushed them as hard as I can with apporpriate loads. Do I think they would take 80K in pressure. I do not believe I have ever pushed them that hard and do not wish to because there are other issues involved with that level of pressure. No need to play with that snake, eventually you WILL get bit.

I am sure you did not mean any aggression by calling me THE EXPERT HERE but I will be honest in that I do not like that label. There are dozens on here that know far more then I do about a good many things. I am no different then you or anyone else, my full time job just happens to be making rifles.

I try not to come off as a know it all because I certainly am not one. If I have come off that way to you, I apologize.

Good Shooting!!

Kirby Allen(50)
 
Kirby...I did not mean to offend or label. To me you are one of the top experts here even though you may humble yourself a bit. You have never come acrross as a "know it all" just an honest guy that talks about his experiences. I do a fair amount of shooting and handloading but only with factory rifles. I also have to say that I am an "accumulator".....one that travels the chatrooms trying to learn more and glean info from credible people. That sometimes gets me in trouble. But, you are definately one of the guys of whom I like to read your first had experience.
 
Kraky,

I am here for the same reasons you are, to learn more and offer what I have learned in the past. No more, no less. We have a great group of guys here on LRH. It is truely like no where else on the web.

Good Shooting!!

Kirby Allen(50)
 
Flybuster quotes himself
[ QUOTE ]
Kirby, where could a fella find some pictures of your Allen magnum cartridges, What is the cartridge they are based on?Thanks.

[/ QUOTE ]
 
Warning! This thread is more than 18 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top