You did okay, it's a bit long but we can figure this out and give you some thoughts in the right direction. When you write anything ".270" there's some dedicated diehards of the .277 caliber on here. So…this thread may end up being as long as your opening question. From your opening dissertation
you reload, so with that you have a number of options. If you want to stay with a factory SAMMI cartridge I would recommend a .270WSM, if you want to hurl heavy bullets with that .270 WSM then build it with a 1:8 twist. However...if you are using this rifle for deer hunting hurling heavy bullets might not be the answer, especially if you have a lot of bullets already in stock. I definitely would stay away from the "new" designer hot rod 27s out there. They are barrel burners and they are expensive to shoot "if" you can find the brass. A box of 27 Nosler brass right now is $118 for 25 pieces, .270 Weatherby mag brass is running less, they're only $65 for 20 pieces: and...I didn't look hard but where I did look they were out of stock. What I have found for the "new" designer dinosaur killers is that they get splashed across the cover of every gun magazine available, and....then after a year or two the brass and the availability of the cartridge in a particular rifle is not longer available.
If you want something that is different that does have some horsepower in the .277 caliber you might want to take a very close look at the .270 Ackley Improved. I built one for myself and then I built one for my son a short time later. I still do not understand the reasoning behind why someone has not looked to get this cartridge SAAMI approved and factory supported. P.O. Ackley did not have a whole lot of good things to say about improving the .270 Winchester, however that was a 100 years ago when the powders we have today were not available. I am running a 150gr Nosler ABLR out of a Lilja 26 inch barrel getting 3100fps. With that said with a 200 yard zero the bullet is 1.25 inches high at 100 yards and 5.7 (6 inches) low at 300 yards. At 300 yards that bullet is still carrying 2300 ft-lbs of energy. I can get 3300fps out of the cartridge, however my rifle likes the 3100fps load so that is what I'm shooting. For me personally this is all of the whitetail cartridge that I need. I'd say as an elk cartridge as well, but I have never been on an elk hunt and after 76 orbits around the sun the probability of that happening is not too good. I keep saying that I am going to play with the 130 grain bullets, I have some 130gr and some 140gr Accubonds, just haven't gotten around to them as of yet. It has been a while since I played with the .270 AI, I've posted a photo of a 300 yard target that was shot. The rifle is a Ruger 77, the action has been blueprinted/squared, glass and pillar bedded, with a 26 inch, 1:10 Lilja barrel that is contoured to the factory spec barrel. The barrel is a hunting barrel so two shots do very well, the third shot wants to open up the groups a bit more. With all that I have written here, conduct an honest and true comparison with these ballistics to the "new" designer cartridges out there. I am using less powder (powder=weight=recoil), components are readily available and the cartridge is easy to load for.