I do not think the WSM and RSAUM are falling off in popularity. I have two .300 WSMs and a 7MM SAUM. And if it did, the PRC might, too. But no one can tell what the future holds. The .257 WBY was produced in 1944, and its parent case, .375 H&H, was produced in 1912. Both have a longitudinal presence as they stood the test of time and are still being made today after 80 years; that's pretty darn good to me.Seems like things are all over the place at the moment with these 25 wildcats.
Is there a good table or list of starting cases, action lengths, and bolts needed, along with water capacity?
For myself, it seems like the PRC is the one to go with since the WSM and RSAUM are falling off in popularity. Weatherby brass by itself is over $2/case and in limited supply so, not a super popular option either. The PRC case itself seems to be the safest bet for future support.
What other case is a good one for a 257 Weatherby class cartridge? Personally, I would like to avoid the belted brass but, I am beginning to wonder if a new barrel with a different twist might be a better overall option in 257 Weatherby versus a wildcat in 25-something. More widely available brass though would be a nice benefit over a 257 Weatherby.
I was able to acquire enough brass for the life of my barrel. As of 5 minutes ago, the .257 WBY brass was available at Grafs. You can also use .264 WM and 7MM RM brass. I went with the .257 WBY as my first .25 cal and a tribute to the pioneer Roy Weatherby. My barrel is 1:7" and specifically built to propel the heavy bullets - 131 BJ, 133/135 Berger, 134 Hornady, and 145 Black Hole. And hopefully soon, Chinchiga's 160g.
Regarding the belted concern, I load for .257 WBY, .264 WM, 3 .300 WMs, .30 LARA, .338 WM, and the 7MM RM and 7MM STW when I still had them without any issues.
So, for me, the .257 WBY is the easy button. But we all have different preferences and intended purposes, so go with yours. Good luck!
Last edited: