codyadams
Well-Known Member
That or the 143 eld-x.I would try the 140 ELD-M. From what I've seen they perform well.
That or the 143 eld-x.I would try the 140 ELD-M. From what I've seen they perform well.
I also make sure the tips are open on the bergers with a small wire drill on rounds intended for hunting. Takes about the same amount of time as chamfering brass, maybe a little less, and can be done once the rounds are loaded. Never a single issue with expansion in 7mm 168 and 180's, 6.5 cal 140's, and 30 cal 185's, all VLD's, as well as the 30 cal 215 hybrid.I'm probably going to dedicate the 6.5 to gongs & coyotes. I may come back later & try some Berger's in it. I worked on some 140 & 170 Berger's in a 270wsm today and it's looking favorable so far. I did shoot the original 168vlds in my 7mm RM way back when they were unheard of in most parts of the country. They were very accurate but out of two white tails one made a grapefruit sized exit wound (which I'm completely ok with) and the other penciled through. Both deer around 250yds. Partly my lack of understanding about LR bullets used at close range was the fault of it penciling through. But I know more now about where make shots for close range & I've heard that berger has made changes for more reliable expansion. So I'm pretty excited about them in the wsm.
Yes, really, they aren't a bonded bullet. Even the interlock will consistently break up at those kinds of impact velocities.Not really. If you look at the design, the eld-m has a thicker jacket at the nose, but stays the same throughout the body. On an extensive write up I did on this bullet, I found the bullet had no trouble holding together when starting at 3050 fps, the issues I ran in to were the opposite. My niece used it to shoot a pronghorn buck at 980 yards, made two hits and neither expanded at all, acted like a fmj. All the bullet I recovered were between 78 and 95 or so grains, which out of 16 animals this season ranging from pronghorn to elk, was 3. On whitetail, I wouldn't feel bad using it (though I much prefer the Berger, over 20 kills with it and much better overall than the eld-m) as long as I kept impact velocity above 2000 fps or so. Overall, I wasn't too impressed with this bullet though. Just my experience.
I shot or witnessed 16 animals, ranging from pronghorn to elk, taken with this bullet just this year, the closest at 150 yards with an impact velocity of over 2850 fps (and left a decent sized exit), and none had an issue of breaking up, all either exited or were recovered with 50% retained weight or better.Yes, really, they aren't a bonded bullet. Even the interlock will consistently break up at those kinds of impact velocities.
IF you didn't recover the bullets you don't know that they didn't breakup and usually the large exit wound is a good indication that they did.I shot or witnessed 16 animals, ranging from pronghorn to elk, taken with this bullet just this year, the closest at 150 yards with an impact velocity of over 2850 fps (and left a decent sized exit), and none had an issue of breaking up, all either exited or were recovered with 50% retained weight or better.
The recovered ones impacted at 2400fps-2100 fps, and were on a mule deer buck around 500 yds, a 6x6 bull elk at a little over 800 yds, and a cow elk at just over 700. Bonded or not, that was not the issue with this bullet. I will say I did not have the opportunity to test them on an elk at close range, having heavier skin, bone and muscle tissue combined with a higher impact velocity may have changed the story some.
However, on pronghorn (whitetail sized game) with impact velocities of 2850 fps down to 2100 fps, all 10 animals had exits from 1"-2.5" (accept the one buck at 980, which the bullet did not expand) whether bone was hit or not.
But if your personal experience on game with the 147 was different, I would like to hear, it is always good to have more information to add.