fyaman2
Active Member
Have you seen the Seekins slam or havak?
Suppressors are illegal in Canada.Maybe think about not using the suppressor. As nice as it is to shoot suppressed, it adds weight. I'm assuming that you would be flying to Alaska rather than driving. If you were driving not sure how Canada feels about suppressors
Then if driving to Alaska having a suppressor may extend the trip without hunting while there.Suppressors are illegal in Canada.
I would only go to Alaska.Suppressors are illegal in Canada.
Via plane? That is what I was saying earlier that by plane you'll be ok,I would only go to Alaska.
YeahVia plane? That is what I was saying earlier that by plane you'll be ok,
Look at what trijicon has to offer. The Credo line might save some weight and if you can handle less magnification the accupoint line is surprisingly light.Ok. Great feedback so far. Next debate is to cut weight on scopes. Im die hard on NX8, tuff to beat for price, optics, and weight. What other scopes out there that can beat 28 oz? I would immediately discredit Zeiss and Leupold. It's simple they do not hold zero from my experience and would never buy another.
I was looking at the March scopes today. Really like the FML-3 reticleMy 6.5 prc got a nx8 20x few years ago.Like that set up a lot.I favor the March reticle as its a bit thicker and nice for hunting ,but nx8 is also uliminated
My favorite scope for work inside 1000 yards is the NF NXS compact 2.5-10x42. 20 ounces, great glass, excellent tool that hasn't failed yet, and we own seven of them on hard-use hunting rifles across 5 states.Ok. Great feedback so far. Next debate is to cut weight on scopes. Im die hard on NX8, tuff to beat for price, optics, and weight. What other scopes out there that can beat 28 oz? I would immediately discredit Zeiss and Leupold. It's simple they do not hold zero from my experience and would never buy another.