Buzzsaw
Well-Known Member
Both are really nice!! I think you just helped Ruger sell a bunch of these
Both are really nice!! I think you just helped Ruger sell a bunch of these
It is amazing what changing out the trigger does for these rifles, whether Jard or Timney. I put a Timney in my 6 Creed and the first group I shot with 105 JLK's went .188".I've got 3 of the Gen 2s. I like them better than the Gen 1s as far as looks go. My only gripes are the trigger, which is heavy and has a lot of creep, and the cheek riser, which is too low. You can replace the trigger with a Timney or a Jard, which I did. If you want the higher cheek rest, it will cost you $29.99 from Ruger. For the cost of these rifles, they should come with the extra cheek risers and stock length adapters like Savage does.
I was fondling one of these at Cabelas this evening. I know they shoot well, but I was not a fan of the gen 1 for some reason. The gen 2 looks pretty nice. The stock seemed flexy though seemed to have generous float so maybe not an issue? I know inexpensive gun so not going to be perfect, but Anybody shoot these with bipod have any issues?
Lou
I've only had Gen1 rifles, .300 BLK Ranch and 6mm CM Predator. I still use the rotary mag on the .300 BLK, and never had an issue. I really like the rifles, and they're pretty darn accurate.
I don't like the AR magazine versions, because it has AR magazine limitations. I get that the ARC was designed with those limits in mind, but I still don't like it. I'd just like a little liberty with seating depth if the throat allows. I don't like the mag limitations on my .300 BLK rifle either, but I'm living with it.
My buddy just got a Gen 2 Ranch in .224. It's a decent shooter as is, several of his loads for other rifles shooting MOA or better out the gate. He said he'd like a better trigger, he'll probably go Timney as he doesn't like the bladed trigger anyway.
Should note that the standard barrel is not 20". More like 18.75-19" to muzzle crown. I think Ruger is counting the muzzle brake in that length.I'm pleased with adjustments that Ruger made on Gen ii. Stock is stiffer and shooting unsuppressed (at moment) no flex in stock. Stock is more ergonomic for sure. The LOP kit is nice and have them on both rifles. When I try suppressed shooting I do think I'll like the weight kit. Bolt and handle are enough upgrades and was something I can avoid from prior model. Barrel is a thicker taper but is offset by the fluting. No accuracy differences in the rifles I've bought assuming due to same barrel making process and bedding.
I picked up a Ruger American Go Wild last month, still in Load Development stage, but it seems promisingstill waiting on a 7mmPRC