Help Support Long Range Hunting Forum
Well, that's a reason. I figured they would be over-bored to the point 2nd-rate machining wouldn't matter. Maybe not…
I think it was the proper size ish, mine was on a 243 Win. Could have bored the hole out until it stopped hitting but I didn't care much,
Agreed. I think my point is that a radial brake isn't worth paying much for because it's so simple. As long as it has the right threads and isn't off-angle by like 5 degrees, it works. Sounds like taylorbok actually got one that was enough off to matter, which kind of blows my mind…
Some of those are also made with aluminum.
Ross Brakes is the most economical self-timing brakes $99 but non-radial.
I hear mixed reviews on aluminum brakes. I have no problem with the strength of aluminum, but wondering if the difference in expansion as it heats up causes issues.
I have only seen them used in rimfires and anodized.
I bought one that was advertised a 6.5 CM brake. When it arrived, the bore was big enough to send a .60 caliber bullet thru it. Doubtful it would have reduced any recoil. It was basically a flash suppressor. Don't want your money. Contact Ross Brakes and get one of his $49.00 shipped brakes. He'll cut them exactly to your specs. It reduce your recoil better than most.
For the same price point between aluminum and SS, I'd go with SS. But if you are so inclined to use the aluminum, go for it. I have multiple muzzle brakes/brands since 2003 and I have stayed away from aluminum. Good luck!
Does Ross make radial brakes? All the ones I see on their website are directional.
