$300 scale advice

Google garmin watch - you need one ! Navigation, ballistic solutions, your heartbeat and O2 levels, ekg and defibrillation monitoring even!
Wow what a way to keep tabs on you. I was wondering why a guy at work was talking to his watch. I just thought he was a little off. I was calling him Night Rider. lol
 
Save your money buy the fxi. All the cheap and mid priced electronics are strain gauges. You want a magnetic force balance. It's better tech that's why it costs more.
Better for what amount of added precision that's required for what manner of accuracy at what distances?
 
Have a $300 budget for a scale. Trying to decide between a used Denver Instruments PI 214 or a new A&D EJ-123. Goal here is to take the charges thrown by my cheap autoloader and "finish them off" on a more accurate scale. It's a budget compromise.

Both options claim greater resolution and repeatability than what I need. Neither are electromagnetic (I can't afford an FX - 120i), so I will probably check against a known weight every 10 loads or so to watch out for drift. at my loading pace, that's not a problem, I load maybe 200 rounds a year.

The PI-214 is one serous-looking piece of equipment, but it's old tech. Better off just buying the newer EJ-123?
I think the best advice is to try and find out where the load cell in the scale you are interested in was made, because
90% of load cells come from China which bring a question to mind of the reliability with regard to calibration stability.
 
If I tried to financially justify all the things I have purchased for reloading and hunting/shooting, I would still be hunting with the old Savage 30.06. It helped me harvest more deer than any other rifle I've owned. That old Bushnell 3-9 did its job as well.
Sometimes you just want to upgrade. It's not about bragging rights. It's about personal satisfaction and eliminating weak links in my process.
 
Yep, I also mix up black, not rocket science and if done wet, no way dangerous.
Yup. I made my own charcoal from pecan tree sheds. For me it kind of was rocket science, I used it for the ejection charges in my L1 high power rocket. Balled milled the parts, wet it with isopropyl to make a "dough", roll it out into a thin patty, push it through a screen, dry it, test it.
Better for what amount of added precision that's required for what manner of accuracy at what distances?

Depends. Hole in a hole at 100? 1/4" at 200? 300? 1000? Longer? Everyone has their need.


I watch that channel. I've even commented and gotten some replies about the pecan limb charcoal that I made and used. It was good stuff and readily available.
 
Better for what amount of added precision that's required for what manner of accuracy at what distances?
It's not just accuracy. The cheaper digitals will drift they have programming which tries to keep them zeroed so they dont respond well to trickling. As for accuracy just because a scale reads to .02 does not mean it's that accurate. Even the fxi in practical terms is good to 3-4 divisions which is 3-4 times what it's reading capability is. There are some videos around that explain it better. So the fx will read to .002 but it's practical accuracy is .006-.008. Still dang good.
 
It's not just accuracy. The cheaper digitals will drift they have programming which tries to keep them zeroed so they dont respond well to trickling. As for accuracy just because a scale reads to .02 does not mean it's that accurate. Even the fxi in practical terms is good to 3-4 divisions which is 3-4 times what it's reading capability is. There are some videos around that explain it better. So the fx will read to .002 but it's practical accuracy is .006-.008. Still dang good.
Yeah, for me it is accuracy, not just group sizes. A +/- .05 load drift has no bearing for my rifles' accuracy at 200 to 1000 yards in many calibers/cartridges that range from .223 to .45-.70 ... what matters most is me behind the trigger and scope or iron sights. It's all good and whatever works best for each of us will be best, and that's a good thing.
 
I use the same setup except the scale is a TRX-925 ($374.95 at Creedmoor Sports so it's over the OP's budget). The Chargemaster will drop up to a 1/2 gr high every now and then, and show good. I think powder falls out of the tube after it thinks it's done. Sometimes it tries to add a 1/10th and it over drops. Sometimes the Chargemaster's scale says it's dead on and it's not. It's good enough to drop with. Like digital mic's and calipers the 3rd digit of the TRX-925 isn't all that useful.
This is pretty much my experience. What made you choose the TRX-925 over the A&D 123? They seem very similar, and the A&D is $100 cheaper right now.
 
This is pretty much my experience. What made you choose the TRX-925 over the A&D 123? They seem very similar, and the A&D is $100 cheaper right now.
I didn't know about the other choices. I've had the TRX925 for at least a year. It seemed like a good way to check the RCBS. I was surprised that it didn't always drop the best.
 
..laugh as you wish but I've used my little 5-0-5 RCBS beam for 50+ years and compete in true organized benchrest with PPC's, BR's, Dashers, from 100 to 1000 yards without any issues caused by that little el-cheappo deluxe scale, now if I only could say that about my eye ballz....
20210502_113129.jpg
 
I didn't know about the other choices. I've had the TRX925 for at least a year. It seemed like a good way to check the RCBS. I was surprised that it didn't always drop the best.
Thanks for your input, it is helpful and keeps the thread on track. There is some good info shared and I will look into some of the scales mentioned. Keep the suggestion coming, there is nothing like first hand experience with a product to help others make a better choice.
 
Top