Wolves gone wild.

jmden

Didn't take it that way. In 1984 i promised my son an elk hunting trip when he graduated from high school. The hunt was above the Gibson Res. in MT. To make a long story short i have been going back every year since. Although i don't hunt elk anymore i still enjoy the friendship. It saddens to see what tree hungers are doing to that state. I'm leaving the 18th to see if i can get a woofie.

With hunting relatives that have lived in MT for generations, I hear some of what's going on. The number of folks moving in from out of state with a liberal bent is ridiculous. Folks that have lived there all their lives have seen dramatic changes in the political landscape.
 
Coyboy and Others,
I just finished reading most of these posts...Some what entertaining....This subject has hit a sore spot with me for years and I have felt like there was nothing I could do about..So now I will vent a little....Man has tried to eradicate wolves for centuries....They are just the same as rats to me....No one needs them and it will almost be impossible to make them extinct...In most of Europe they are under control and luckily on some islands they are gone completely....It took early settlers in this country almost 200 years to bring them under control to where man could get the most out of his resources to make a living.....This earth by design has a population that is growing exponentially and to make room for more humans that means there will or should be less room for rats and wolves and other "vermin".....Either that or we have to start eating them instead of beef, pork and venison.....Who wants to take the first bite....:D

These tree huggers, greenies, elitists, and other liberal minded groups have to wake up out of their green smoke filled rooms and learn what real life is....First of all get a real job that produces a product that someone can use (an export would be real nice)......wait back to the subject...most of them couldn't get a real job when they got out of college so they thought they would become "environmentalists".....wait back to the subject

I too live in Hibbing, MN and thought you should know that your assessment per the 2008 DNR wolf report is pretty much 100% correct...There is about 500 square miles in a band approximately 10-15 miles wide across the Iron Range of MN from Grand Rapids to Virginia where wolf reports are rare...Including the Hibbing city proper and most surrounding area...Hibbing is not timber wolf central.....Deer populations remain fairly stable in these semi-populated and semi-cultivated areas consisting of several small towns and cities and mostly private land....(There really isn't much agriculture up here anymore, only the remnants of our forefathers homesteads and a few hobby farmers)...The vast iron mines also are a part of this dead zone....

I see many deer and would love to hunt in this "wolf dead zone" but I have only been up in the Hibbing area for about 12 years and the smaller areas of public land have their "resident hunters" and it would be an infringement to move in on them....I do quite a bit of shed hunting on the public parcels and see many winter kills each spring....They are not wolf kills but natural causes and some coyote depredation.....(wolves leave only the hair and skulls most times...they eat most of the small bones....Coyotes chew on the bones and scatter them)....

I happened to have lived in MN & Northern WI all my life and have been in the midst of the timber wolf propagation in WI since the onset in the early and mid 70s....I lived 2 miles from the Moose Lake pack, about 12 miles from the Bear Lake pack and 25 miles from the Black Lake pack (Black Lake borders MN and WI in Carlton & Douglas Counties about 30 miles south of Duluth)....These collared and heavily protected packs were "planted" contrary to the propaganda always published by the WDNR and MDNR....I believe this is true because I talked with the biologists face to face back in the day.....The WI DNR would like you to believe they "migrated from MN"...These were the three packs that allowed the wolves to circumvent the Duluth/I35/Cloquet metro area blockade.....After that the no coyote hunting during deer season and the hefty $10,000 fines kept us from......you know....Wish I knew then what was going to happen because I have had many, lets say, opportunities over the years......

After the introduction of the three packs that I know of (and lived near) then the spread in Northern WI went like wildfire....Then over to the UP of MI just a few years later and merged with any packs that came from Canada....

I hunt mostly on public land including 1 national forest and 3 state forests in four areas of MN in three counties...In WI I hunt county, state and national forest...Everywhere I hunt there is plenty of wolves...I own land in two MN counties and one county in WI....All the public land as well as my own has seen major improvement to deer habitat in the past 20 years because the timber age class pretty much had all came "ripe" at the same time......The deer populations that should have exploded with the timber cutting have actually been dwindling every year mainly because of wolf & yes bear depredation...One area that I love to hunt north of here out of the "dead-zone" saw a combination of winter kill and wolf kill last winter....I hunted there several days this past year and felt it would not be prudent to shoot any deer there at all...Subsequently I moved to one of my other areas to harvest a buck.....

In Douglas County, WI where I have also hunted for over 50 years we have seen major devastation of deer populations as some are well aware due to both over harvest and wolves (bear & bobcat are also hard on the fawn crop)...examine bear scat the first two weeks in June you will be hard pressed not to find "fawn fingernails"....We see wolves every deer season and usually multiple sightings.....But hear them every night (and sometimes in broad daylight)....That's one thing you don't hear anywhere near Hibbing because there are no packs nearby.....I live within the city limits (the geographical city limits of Hibbing used to be and might still be the largest in the state[larger than MPLS]) but am in a rural area (yes I can hunt and shoot on my land)...I hear coyotes nearly every night (and see them frequently) but have yet to hear a T-wolf at home or anywhere near hear....He very well may have seen wolf scat (if he knows the difference between that and a coyote) in the dead zone because loners do pass thru from time to time and in some areas with even more frequency.....

Enough history back to my thoughts.....I also hunt Wyoming & MT and SD from time to time and would like to hunt ID someday.....Most everyone I meet out there is down to earth and sensible....I share most of your feelings and feel your pain....I would hate to see the common sense reputation of everybody that lives in Hibbing, MN to be tarnished by one young fellow's visions of "world peace"...Most everyone in northern MN knows that the T-wolf has never been endangered here...The area along the Canadian border has always had some and it really probably would have stayed that way if the Feds hadn't intervened....

One last thing the guy made fun and called WI the "bait hunt state" or something to that effect.....50% of the hunters in WI do not bait and do not approve of it and I am in that 50%....It is legal in WI and I will not knock anyone for practicing it there.....I personally do not agree with any kind of baiting and in my opinion it is not fair chase.....That includes "food plots".....So when he mentioned they have a farmer till up or leave standing crops or whatever he was talking about I would call that baiting....
I have a sneaking hunch that he and his group may have shot a few deer on or near that field....gun)who's the baiter now....

That's all I have for now hope you westerners will accept me back because I do not share many of the views of the other Hibbing hunter or where ever he is from (he actually may hunt in a different area and didn't want to give up his honey hole).....

Randy
 
Well said Randy.
Wisconsin has increased the number of bear tags, because of a too late realization that we have too many. That is a good first step. Starting the season about 9 days earlier would be a much better step so we can beat the acorns from hitting the ground.

WIDNR is doing a bobcat study as they feel they lost the handle on their population. one of my friends seen a kat with too kits last summer, i asked if he shot them said NO.

Well his wife KOed one during deer season, good for her, she did it on her own parogative, God bless here spirit. Instead of applying for limited permits they need to sell a general lic. with a limit of one, thus giving all the cat hunters an opportunity every year.

Wolves well this is where we are behind the game, delisting is Feb 1st 2012, we need a season to open up on that day and run for 2 months. But that is not in the works, WIDNR says they will control wolves with-in there ranks.

WI DNR=Eco-idiots.
 
We have our annual meeting on season regs.1/7 But the WOLF is not to be talked about at this meeting.Even though it is the game changer.
 
We have our annual meeting on season regs.1/7 But the WOLF is not to be talked about at this meeting.Even though it is the game changer.


Is that politically correct or what!

And the rules for this season are the beginning will be on __/__/__ the ending will be on __/__/__. We haven't yet determined the takeable animals, limits, gender or number. If you would please report each harvest we will inform you when and if the season is terminated prior to the established closure date.

Them's my kinda rules. DUH!!!:rolleyes:

I'm getting fed up with all of this. For my own mental health and stability I'm gonna hafta avoid these threads.....

Some time this summer I'm gonna set smack dab on the ID/MT border and see what happens.

Reminds me of the story of the Mississippi Delta water fowl hunter suspected of shootin' ducks f. The warden picked up a duck, stuck his finger up it's butt, sniffed and tasted and declared it a Louisiana or a Mississippi duck. Same procedure for each duck. It came time to determine shooters residency...

The fish cop asks, Where are you from, LA or MS? Shooter sands, drops trou bends over and says....U tell Me!

Me thinks I need a counseling session....:rolleyes: Way too much woof anxiety....
 
We have our annual meeting on season regs.1/7 But the WOLF is not to be talked about at this meeting.Even though it is the game changer.
I'll see ya there, I bet this one is going to be standing room only... at least I hope it'll be that way.

Cody
 
ok, so i didnt read all 11 pages, but being from Texas I may not completely understand how everything goes up there, but...Why dont you guys just handle the problem yourself. Just follow the 3 S's shoot it, shovel it, shutup about it......
 
The effectiveness of SSS has proven a very poor strategy to deal with wolves. Their reproductive rate, range, dispersal distance, coupled with intelligence and senses makes it difficult to stabilize much less reverse population trends. It requires a kill rate of about 70% to annually to effect populations. In plain numbers for simple math for every 1000 about 700 need to die. Given tags, seasons, highways etc.. Idaho will probably top out @ 300 this year. Most folks figure there are at least 2000 on the ground. Historically, around the globe it has taken shoot on sight, traps, poison, aerial gunning, bounties, and paid professionals to reduce numbers in a meaningful way.
Texas may get their chance with the Feds opening a second southern front in Utah and points south. I don't see much posted from folks outside the northern recovery zone, what per cent of hunters out there realize another introduction is pointed at the southwest? I Guarantee you'll want it stopped before it starts!
 
It would seem to me that with some variations the solution of the problem will similar to the previous solution.

My research, limited to stories, googling and limited personal experience seem to indicate that the "locals", the ones with the problem, solved it.

There were fewer people then with fewer resources. Most westerners had a horse, gun and something to protect. There results were effective to the point of attaining a livable balance. Wolves were not completely eliminated but were very infrequently seen with no observable impact from the few remaining wolves.

Any observable impacts were handled locally.

A ranchers, at that time, had the freedom to protect there own.

Many States, Idaho being one, has implemented the "Castle" doctrine. The current definition of which appears to me to be where my feet are and within the walls of my dwelling. What if, the definition were extended to, as I have implemented, my property?

On another tangent, what if, instead of adopting a section of highway for rubbish collection, some independent thinking fella or folks adopted an elk herd? Then simply set about managing predation on that elk herd to the point where the level of predation on that herd is managed to their acceptable levels.

Just thinking out loud. No evil intended.
 
Posted: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 12:15 am | Updated: 3:18 am, Tue Jan 10, 2012.

By BILL BULEY/Staff writer | 5 comments

COEUR d'ALENE - Kathy Stewart calls her green van the "Wolfmobile."

She wears T-shirts and coats with pictures of wolves.

She says the wolf is her guardian.

So, the message she wanted to deliver to the Idaho Department of Fish and Game on Monday about wolves was not surprising.

"Stop killing them."

"Get education about the wolf. Don't go out and kill it because you can," she said before a candlelight vigil at Independence Point.

Stewart, joined by husband Glen wearing his wolf T-shirt, was one of about 10 people who took part in the event organized by the Northern Idaho Wolf Alliance.

They carried signs that read, "Exterminated, Endangered, Eradicated again," "No to wolf slaughter," and "The big bad wolf was framed."

One sign had a picture of a wolf, with the words, "Would you torture this?"

The vigil was "to honor 337 fallen Idaho and Montana wolves, and protest this war against wolves" on the night of "The Full Wolf Moon."

According to a press release, more than 200 of Idaho's wolves have been killed by hunters in four months.

"With IDFG's goal being to eliminate all but 150-200 wolves in the entire state, perhaps 400-500 wolves could still be in the crosshairs, and the season won't end until June 30 in some areas," the release said. "That means a 10-month long season, even hunting wolves while they are trying to raise their puppies."

Lanie Johnson of Sandpoint said wolves are critical to the ecosystem.

She said talk that wolves are dangerous to man, kill for sport and are decimating elk populations is "a myth that got started, that people have gone crazy with."

Wolves, Johnson said, are like people. They have families, they take care of their young, they stick together.

"They're very smart," she said.

Not so, said Ryan Caudill of Coeur d'Alene, who arrived at the vigil to protest the pro-wolf demonstration.

Caudill, who carried a sign that read, "Save an elk, kill a wolf," said he has found wolf kills while hunting. The Montana mule deer population has "dropped drastically" because of wolves, he said.

Wolves have killed hunting dogs, too, he said.

"We dog hunt, dogs die," he said.

Lloyd McLougihn debated the role of wolves with vigil participants Monday.

"Why do we want to listen to them about how wolves are so good?" he said.

He said the wolves in Idaho are from Canada, and far different from the population that once roamed the mountains.

"We don't want these wolves here - they eat all our animals," he said.

Ann Sydow, member of the Northern Idaho Wolf Alliance, said the public needs to know how wolves are being hunted. They're being shot and trapped, she said, adding that trapping is cruel.

"I think if more people knew what was really happening, I think they would be really outraged," she said.

Sydow said wolves are not random killers of anything that comes their way.

She said out of 2.2 million cattle in Idaho last year, only 75 were killed by wolves. Bears and mountain lions are more likely to kill people, she said.

"They're by far the least dangerous predator out there," she said. "They're the most beneficial too. They don't see people as prey. They could kill a person. They just don't."

Glen Stewart said the bottom line is, people shouldn't kill wolves.

"If they're going to do anything, go out and learn from the wolf," he said.

IDFG spokesmen could not be reached for comment Monday.
*************************************************************

What really chaps me about these ill informed greenies is this:

According to the Western Legacy Alliance, over the past 10 years $35 million in taxpayer dollars was paid to 13 environmental-animal rights groups and $4.,7 billion in taxpayer money was paid to environmental-animal rights law firms between… 2003 and 2007.
The environmental-animal rights groups contest some of these numbers, but not the fact they are using or abusing the Equal Access to Justice Act. Compare those numbers to the $922 million the USFWS spent on the 986 endangered and threatened species in one year.

Wasting the American peoples hard earned money. For What? Welfare Biologists & Welfare Lawyers.
 
Watch this and understand why our moose populations are near epic decline...along with our elk, deer, antelope...and our cattle and sheep......

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMC7aZNXnL8&feature=share]wolves attack moose, Denali - YouTube[/ame]
 
Warning! This thread is more than 13 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top