Winmag, Sorry to come off crappy. I didn't mean it as such, it was a serious question. I have talked to a lot of people on forums and in person who have said that kimber hunting rifles were not very accurate, in a general sense. With the ones I have dealt with and heard about it seems like there have been more that were bad than good, so to me, and this is just my experience, it would seem that the ones you shot were more of the fluke than the norm. I have always wanted a kimber 45 and I have heard and read nothing but praise for their tactical rifles, but I have heard a LOT of horror stories about their hunting rifles, and have a couple in my own experience. I agree that the LRH members have a lot of experience and I too would take the advice of the majority. Maybe you are in the majority, maybe I am, I don't know, we will see.
Either way, it seems to me their accuracy is inconsistent, and I would go with the manufacturer with the most consistent accuracy, because you can't look at them and tell the difference, and with most you can't shoot it till you own it. If 60 % had success and 40% had failure with accuracy, how would you see the odds of getting a good gun, would it be worth dropping 1200.00 to gamble 60/40 odds? I would be looking for a sure bet if I were the buyer. A kimber I can assure you, is not a sure bet, and they don't always make it right with the customer either, that is experience as well. Not dishing on the company as a whole, but their standard and my standard are not equal, both rifles met their standards, neither met mine.