S sscoyote Well-Known Member Joined Feb 26, 2003 Messages 1,318 Location Pueblo, CO Jan 8, 2004 #1 I'm surprised i don't see more posted here about this bullet-- anybody know why?? Seems like it'd be a great long-ranger.?
I'm surprised i don't see more posted here about this bullet-- anybody know why?? Seems like it'd be a great long-ranger.?
L LDO Well-Known Member Joined Sep 23, 2003 Messages 251 Location eagle,co Jan 8, 2004 #2 for the speeds u would get with it and the b.c. it just doesnt have lr. potential that the 142mk has,my-2-dave
for the speeds u would get with it and the b.c. it just doesnt have lr. potential that the 142mk has,my-2-dave
J jb1000br Official LRH Sponsor Joined Jul 8, 2003 Messages 1,323 Location Central PA Jan 8, 2004 #3 the published BC on the 155 is about .025 less than the 142. that is pretty much it. low bc and heavy weight are no good for LR when the 142 and other 140 class bullets are around. JB
the published BC on the 155 is about .025 less than the 142. that is pretty much it. low bc and heavy weight are no good for LR when the 142 and other 140 class bullets are around. JB
B BountyHunter Well-Known Member LRH Supporter Joined Jun 13, 2007 Messages 5,797 Location Wilmington NC Jan 8, 2004 #4 Biggest reason, quality is not to standard of the 142 for a factory bullet. It has been tried, but just did not work. BH
Biggest reason, quality is not to standard of the 142 for a factory bullet. It has been tried, but just did not work. BH