Tex_Hunter
Well-Known Member
Escort is a poor analogy, I've always preferred the comparison between the old 5.4l 3V Triton in my 2010 F150 vs the 5.0l Coyote engine offered starting in 2011. On paper and in the real world they are very comparable, in the 09-16 trucks both even had the same 6speed transmission; one is just older tech, less efficient/not quite as good gas mileage, higher displacement (260 has larger case capacity) whereas the 5.0l is a new design, more powerfull etc.I was generalizing in terms of the hate that they get. The 1997 Escort is a perfectly serviceable car (and the same year the 6.5-308 wildcat was legitimized), but they're old and not new, which is the argument Creedmoor fans make against the 260 Rem.
260 Rem fans say the new fangled gizmo is new and annoying, so they grumble about the new fangled-ality of the thing, and say their old stuff is better.
Meanwhile in common sense land, the ballistics between the 6.5 Creed and 260 Rem are almost identical. If anyone cares about the 1gr of water capacity the Creed gives to the 260 then there's the 6.5x47, 6.5PRC, 6.5-284, 6.5x55 that are all faster than either of them. Barrel twist is a useless argument because you can chamber either in whatever twist you want.
Comparing chamberings on the availability of factory ammo in a reloading forum doesn't make a lot of sense. We are not the people who only have 2-6 boxes of factory ammo on the shelf.
We're all aware this is the reloading sub-forum, right?
Is the 5.4 a bad motor? No, but the 5.0 is better in nearly any measurable criteria. With a tune my 5.4l performs at or above the stock 5.0l even. Should I sell my 2010 to buy a newer 5.0 truck? No! but if you are starting from 0 and pricing is comparable then the newer engine is a better choice. I bought a 2010 with the 5.4 because comparable 2011s with a 5.0 were almost 20-30% more. I bought a Creedmoor because that same price difference isnt applicable.
The 260 isnt bad, the 6.5CM is just better.