Who's stretching it out with a 270 WSM?

I have been shooting my 270WSM since about 2004, right after my 2nd go in Iraq. Wanted a new rifle and got my M70 Laminated while home on leave. It has been an excellent rifle for me. I took my largest bull with it and a good muley along with a few WT's..

ElkPicture.jpg


IdahoMuley.jpg


I shot the above with 140 AB's.. After that I messed with 130 IB's a little. Got nearly 3400 out of them and they shot well, but I decided to go heavy with it.. At least heavy for me..

I use the 150 BT as my range/steel/deer bullet and the 150 PT for real elk hunting. I use RL22 and both loads run 3125 or so out of my rifle with identical loads. It isn't a LR rig like you all run, but I can dial up and smack steel to 600, which is as far as I can shoot currently

150 PT Golds

78D133AF.jpg


150 BT

4816F74E.jpg


150 PT

IMG_0824.jpg


I love the 270WSM. I have a 300WSM and 7WSM as well, but I just love to shoot the 270WSM. Great write up, sounds like some new bullets to really let us 270 guys stretch a little more.. Great shooting guys!
 
I think you'd need a long pipe to push the 170s at 3100, but if you could... Wow. Theres a performer for you. I can't think of an animal in NA I wouldn't hunt with the WSM filled with 150 Partitions.


I've got a .270 WSM & have had others. It is a great cartridge — virtually identical in performance to the 7 MM Rem mag., but it's not a dangerous game cartridge. A coastal brown bear deserves more respect, respect via bullet size. Hunting big bears with less than a .338 has been done, but that's a dangerous proposition. A .338 or a .375 is a more fitting round for a big bear that can turn from hunted to hunter in an instant.
 
I'm shooting the 175gr matrix out of mine at 3k fps with a 700bc. Loaded to 2.950" OAL (-.020"j) in a chamber with .180" freebore. Im sure if you went with a .150" freebore you could mag feed in the alpha mags just fine. Im using Seekins DBM for an internal OAL of 3.100", giving me plenty of room to chase the lands.
 
I have a couple of hundred rounds of load development work with the .270 WSM in a Winchester 1885 High Wall (Miruko). I have focused on the 140 and 150 gr ballistic tips an 140 ABs. The .277 140 Accubond has a BC of .496. That results in 6 or 7 inches less drop at 400 yds than my 6.5 WSM or 6.5 X 284 with similar bullets.

I need some help with 150 gr B'tips or other 10 twist heavy bullets. What powder are you using? I just tried a compressed load of Magnum with disappointing velocities and performance. I have tried Retumbo (which is the answer in the 6.5 WSM) Reloader 25, Winchester 780, MagPro, 4000MR. and the best I get is 3110 with a heavily compressed load of 4000MR.:rolleyes:

MagPro is magnificient in the 270 WSM with 130 and 140 gr bullets. I can get 3300 fps with MagPro with 140 gr bullets and still not use as much powder as the book says is max. lightbulb
 
I have a couple of hundred rounds of load development work with the .270 WSM in a Winchester 1885 High Wall (Miruko). I have focused on the 140 and 150 gr ballistic tips an 140 ABs. The .277 140 Accubond has a BC of .496. That results in 6 or 7 inches less drop at 400 yds than my 6.5 WSM or 6.5 X 284 with similar bullets.

I need some help with 150 gr B'tips or other 10 twist heavy bullets. What powder are you using? I just tried a compressed load of Magnum with disappointing velocities and performance. I have tried Retumbo (which is the answer in the 6.5 WSM) Reloader 25, Winchester 780, MagPro, 4000MR. and the best I get is 3110 with a heavily compressed load of 4000MR.:rolleyes:

MagPro is magnificient in the 270 WSM with 130 and 140 gr bullets. I can get 3300 fps with MagPro with 140 gr bullets and still not use as much powder as the book says is max. lightbulb


I am running RL22, CCI250, WW cases. I get right at 3130 for both the PT and BT's. Plus, they shoot pretty well.

Magpro doesn't work with the 150's for you?
 
Anyone care to comment on the temp stability of '22 vs. Magpro? Trying to decide which route to go...
 
Couldn't really say. I do my load work in the Spring/Summer and shoot all year long. Haven't really noticed too much difference with RL22 or Magpro, in my case. I do notice that RL22 will climb in speed if shot quickly, due to chamber temps, but if allowed to cool, RL22 has been excellent as has Magpro.
 
Can anybody tell me how fast I would have to get the .277 170 grain Bergers to stabilize in a 1 in 10 barrel? I am currently getting 3,420 fps with 140 grain Accubonds out of my 270 Dakota with 27 1/2 inch 1 in 10 barrel, so I could probably push the 170s at about 3,100. Also, I am thinking of a very heavy 28 inch barrel with 1 in 10 twist on a 270 WSM built on a long action or single shot bolt action to seat the projectiles way out, for varminting past 500 yards. I am aware that 1 in 10 twist is a bit slow.
 
First we need to know the length of the Berger 170 gr bullets to use a formula to figure out the stability of the bullet. The Greenhill formula is the best known but RSI says they have a nore accurate one.

Second, what kind of powder are you using and what charge. It sounds like you have a real impressive load. Remember that 140 Accubonds have a higher BC than the Bergers.

For 170gr bullets I would expect that VV N-570 would be your highest velocity powder.
 
Can anybody tell me how fast I would have to get the .277 170 grain Bergers to stabilize in a 1 in 10 barrel? I am currently getting 3,420 fps with 140 grain Accubonds out of my 270 Dakota with 27 1/2 inch 1 in 10 barrel, so I could probably push the 170s at about 3,100. Also, I am thinking of a very heavy 28 inch barrel with 1 in 10 twist on a 270 WSM built on a long action or single shot bolt action to seat the projectiles way out, for varminting past 500 yards. I am aware that 1 in 10 twist is a bit slow.

Punch your numbers into JBM stability calculator. JBM - Calculations - Stability

Your going to need to be 6000ft plus, I'm going to give them a try out of my WSM since the Matrix stabilize fine for me but bullet design makes a difference as well.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 13 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top