Len, do you have any evidence to support your claim?
Their is a lot of info about ballot harvesting and the mathematical impossibility of the last election. People have literally been put in jail trying to look into the voting machines like Tina Peter's in mesa County Co.
You won't find the information in the msm, but it is out their.
2000 mules?
Here's who controls the elections. See who they work for ? I found this info in 2018 when PA voted to keep property taxes. lol
As the visibility of the "glitches" found in Dominion Voting Systems continues to spread across multiple states, and the longstanding issues surrounding Election Systems & Software start to re-surface, one critical question has yet to be asked, "How did they manage to corner the U.S. election voter market in the first place?"
On September 14, 2009, Hart Interactive, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Diebold Incorporated and Election Systems & Software, Inc. (ES&S) alleging antitrust claims after the September 2, 2009 purchase of Diebold's outstanding stock of Premier Election Solutions and the assets of Premier Canada. This transaction gave Election Systems & Software a 68% share of the U.S. voting machine market.
Not only did that transaction grant ES&S a monopolistic stranglehold on the election market, Hart alleged and provided evidence of anticompetitive conduct by both Diebold and ES&S. In the lawsuit, Hart states, Diebold and ES&S systemically:
- Wins bids by billing low then gouging locked-in customers for more aftermarket service and equipment.
- Misrepresents by exaggerating the features, capabilities, or certification status of the systems, or by falsely disparaging the features, capabilities, or certification status of rival systems.
- Engages in strategies that raise their rivals codes.
- Imposes unreasonable restrictions on access to software and other intellectual properties – in other words, customers could not have visibility to the source code prior to the election to ensure it had not been tampered with.
- Exerts improper and undue influence on government officials to achieve favorable competitive bidding outcomes.
- Initiates litigation upon losing competitive bidding contests to establish a litigious reputation among customers adding a risk premium to the cost of choosing a rival system.
The filing also cited numerous sources demonstrating the anti-competitive behaviors both companies had engaged in throughout the years.
To gain perspective of the hyper consolidation, before the "merge" of ES&S with Diebold's Premier Election entities, ES&S had a substantial market share in the U.S.
https://opslens.com/how-canada-based-dominion-voting-