Str8shooterTX
Well-Known Member
You are absolutely correct, Str8shooter. Got my decimal in he wrong place there.
lol no worries. I have MANY non therapeutic caffeine days!
You are absolutely correct, Str8shooter. Got my decimal in he wrong place there.
Fliers are there because something in the load or you're shooting was different. Having a good scale can eliminate that variable so you can move on to the next one. If someone told long ago that for $450 I could have done away with a ton of wasted trips to the range, wasted bullets, wasted powder, wasted time, etc. I would have said no way. After all the beams, Chargemaster, Gempro, Accu-touch, etc I bought an FX-120i and it never drifts like a Gempro 250 and you don't have to pick up the pan and set it down again. The Gempro won't register a kernel being placed in the pan unless you pick it up and set it back down or touch it with tweezers. Then 10 cartridges later when you put the empty pan back it reads 0.08 or -0.06. You really have to stay on top of it.
With a good scale you can weigh powder, bullets, brass, etc. accurately, reliably, and FAST eliminating those variables from your equation.
My life is simpler now and I would have paid twice that. Ask anyone if they regret upgrading their scale. Maybe I'm wrong but I certainly consider mine well worth the investment.
This is my method as well.I can throw a charge of powder measured just below what my final weight is then finalize it with a trickler on my beam scale with precise accuracy just about as fast as the chargemaster can and with absolute precision.
I use the new RCBS 505 beam scale...... So far it works to perfection.
Just a thought
Good luck
This is my method as well.
Also.... If you do a optimum charge weight work up, the small changes in charge weight make little difference. A tenth of a grain one way or the other won't show up on paper or on a Chrony. It's not the powder, it's the lack of sensitivity in our current scales and Chronys. There is exceptions, like very small capacity cartridges.. But for the most part, if you have a good CLEAN beam scale or a good electronic scale, the fliers are from something else.
I had a starter scale, it was a RCBS RC 130 and it was all plastic except for the beam and balance weights. It was like $45.00 new. I used it for a few years, and wanted to upgrade to a new scale. So I ordered both a 5-0-5 and a Chargemaster. After getting both, I checked the accuracy of all three, and the cheap RC 130 was just as accurate as the other two. I sold the RC 130 and the Chargemaster...
I love my 5-0-5 scale. Unfortunately they stopped selling them. The few that were still available are twice as expensive now because people are price gouging.
Throwing charges and trickling doesn't take too long, but I still get impatient when I'm waiting for the scale to calm down and show the measurement. I had a plan for a short time to get a 2nd 5-0-5 and 2nd trickler to keep on my bench. Plan was to throw charges and while 1 scale was calming down, throw a charge for the other scale. Then trickle... In theory this would eliminate any wait time. However I reminded myself I shouldn't be in that much of a hurry while reloading and decided against it. Although, I still think this would be a fast and accurate way to measure every powder throw.
My Scott Parker tuned Ohaus 10-10 is accurate and repeatable to a single kernal of H4350.
Part of the accuracy issue for electronic balances and scales is the physical location where you are going to use it. My garage, for example, has florescent lights, and the fuse box and control box forthe sprinkler system located w/in 8 feet of the reloading bench (not to mentions drafts and breezes that flow through the garage to ventilate the place). An electronic scale isn't feasible in that location absent some kind of Faraday cage.
JeffVN