Undermining Hammer?

All of my responses on this thread are known facts; you are welcome to disprove them. As for your false claims and accusations, I will not respond here and cause this thread to be locked or people to get banned unnecessarily because @Len Backus's living room rules of engagement were violated. The OP's post has generated valuable responses for his intended purpose and supported his other thread. And if you misconstrued that, it's on you.

Should you decide to address your false accusations on a separate thread, please provide evidence to justify your unwarranted claims, and I will do the same. I have a couple of friends with extensive audit trails/catalogs of these false accusations. While you are at it, since you are seeking the truth, respond to @CRP003's #107 post. I know a couple of guys who would have easily attacked and accused me in the past like you are doing now. I am glad they have since moved on, and that's a win for the LRH community. And you, too, can move on as most of us have and be part of a productive and respectful contributor to the LRH community.
I never said you lied. I simply said that you make claims that you have either no experience with or very minimal. You have never once posted results on game of any animal that I can remember.
Im not attacking I'm simply pointing out that it's always the same people as yourself having. A negative view on them. Offering other bullets and suggestions based on no real world experience. While someone like myself has tons of real world hunting with these.
all you simply do is have negative comments towards hammer. Then you state someone we all know has experience like Fordy and ignore anyone else who also has a tremendous amount of game down with them.
I do t believe anyone has said you lie. You just pass off most your opinions as fact
 
Last edited:
All of my responses on this thread are known facts; you are welcome to disprove them. As for your false claims and accusations, I will not respond here and cause this thread to be locked or people to get banned unnecessarily because @Len Backus's living room rules of engagement were violated. The OP's post has generated valuable responses for his intended purpose and supported his other thread. And if you misconstrued that, it's on you.

Should you decide to address your false accusations on a separate thread, please provide evidence to justify your unwarranted claims, and I will do the same. I have a couple of friends with extensive audit trails/catalogs of these false accusations. While you are at it, since you are seeking the truth, respond to @CRP003's #107 post. I know a couple of guys who would have easily attacked and accused me in the past like you are doing now. I am glad they have since moved on, and that's a win for the LRH community. And you, too, can move on as most of us have and be part of a productive and respectful contributor to the LRH community.
I'm glad you said it you have others do your data collection. What false statement have I made?

The burden is on you I'll address anything I've ever said. No problems here.
If I'm wrong I'll admit it. But most times you either block people or ignore a point made that doesn't line up with your assumptions.

It seems everyone this topic comes up people give a opinion just like I do. Then if it's a good one about hammer. They are called fan boys. Which I am sure. But I also don't go on threads about badlands and call anyone a fan boy.
 
Here is my take on this subject no matter what the subject may be is where I see the main issue for the burr under someone's saddle. Everyone has an opinion, good, bad and ugly. State it and move on. Its when that opinion becomes a freaking "crusade" to "prove", "convince", "defend", and "belittle" if it is 180° from yours is when the crap hits the fan. Stop the crusades and life will be better for all. If a product doesn't work for you, make your own decisions to find another product. You want a better product? Find one and move on. You want a product made differently? Invest and risk your total life assets on a business plan and work your butt off to make that product work and bring it to market. If you don't have a financial oar in the water, you don't have a say on how any product must be made.

I'd like to think we are reasonable on LRH, but there is no doubt the influence of social media and its associated lack of accountability and personal responsibility has created a path to become KBW's.

I am comfortable with my own beliefs and decisions. I do not need to convince anyone. It's right for me and I don't care if anyone agrees or not. You are not walking in my shoes.

Yeah, I know, nobody can walk in my shoes. Better I say it.

I hope we can sit back and enjoy whatever we choose to do instead of the vitriol that seems to becoming more and more prevalent on ALL forums. Len has a very nice living room here and it would be nice if we can be invited to sit in it.

I am done and hope y'all have a great day doing whatever you like to do no matter what it may be.
 
Ok so first off, I do think the message in the original post has been grossly misunderstood and misinterpreted. I'm going to do my best to simply add some counter arguments to the following quotes and try not to add any condescending tone to it, because I truly am not trying to be condescending and I do not feel superior to anyone here. It's just counter arguments is all.

Everyone has an opinion, good, bad and ugly. State it and move on. Its when that opinion becomes a freaking "crusade" to "prove", "convince", "defend", and "belittle" if it is 180° from yours is when the crap hits the fan. Stop the crusades and life will be better for all. If a product doesn't work for you, make your own decisions to find another product. You want a better product? Find one and move on. You want a product made differently? Invest and risk your total life assets on a business plan and work your butt off to make that product work and bring it to market. If you don't have a financial oar in the water, you don't have a say on how any product must be made.
So my counter here is that many times the "opinion" stated is a concern or a perceived issue with the product. I really don't think anyone is on a crusade to point out those things (I could be wrong). I think it's simply your opinion and perception that it's a crusade based on your attachment to the product. And this isn't meant to be directed just at you, Muddy, so my apologies. It's meant for anyone sharing a similar perception as you, so "you" is more so meant as those who this applies to. On the flip side, I think those with your similar perception could be viewed as on a crusade to discredit and dismiss any perceived criticisms and concerns, yes? It can certainly go both ways. I do understand your perception and I understand how it forms and why. I'm also not saying I think you or anyone else in particular is actually on a crusade against those with anything perceived as negative about Hammer. I'm just making a point.

I also think, with respect, it's unfair and unacceptable to say that if a product doesn't work for you that you should simply move on. If there's room for improvement or you think there's a serious issue worth addressing and hopefully get fixed for the betterment of everyone that uses it, wouldn't that be worth mentioning and pushing for? A person is really just supposed to be like, "oh well, I'll just use something else. Sucks to be the next guy"? It's a serious question and again I'm not trying to be a jerk here. I'm quite calm as I type this and am just trying to make my point.

I also think it's unrealistic and infeasible to expect anyone to have to go make their own product if they don't like the ones available. To a certain degree, sure, but if someone is just trying to see the current product be improved, that should be acceptable. I do get that it would be more acceptable to expect someone to do that if they truly just hated everything about the product and had no hope in it being fixed to their liking. Yes, those guys should think about doing it themselves then. I just don't think many of the guys getting labeled as anti Hammer are in that category. Perhaps when there are the onsies and twosies that just want to absolutely hate on Hammer pop up and spout off, it just makes it seem like everyone is like that guy but that guy is just the only one making it blatantly obvious? Maybe it's a subconscious thing like that?

I am comfortable with my own beliefs and decisions. I do not need to convince anyone. It's right for me and I don't care if anyone agrees or not.
I hope we can sit back and enjoy whatever we choose to do instead of the vitriol that seems to becoming more and more prevalent on ALL forums
I take this as you perceive people are trying to flat out say not to use Hammer Bullets. Is that what you're saying or how you feel? That it's more so people just not liking Hammers and trying to convince others not to use them? I get a lot of the responses if that's the case, but I will counter that saying I don't see it that way. I see it as it started out with people just stating their concerns and what they see as an issue or potential issue, and that has been met with resistance and all of that has evolved to where we are now.

I for one have no issue with Hammer existing and being successful. I have no issue with anyone deciding to use Hammers and continuing to use them. There are indeed TONS of success stories out there from guys using them, and there will be tons more. I know that. I'll never dispute that. When they work as designed, they do great. I've never once said it's a junk bullet and will never work well. I can't speak for everyone though and I know I have indeed seen some that have said such things, unfortunately, that seem to be less open to seeing the good potential.

I truly think a lot of the problem has been just a complete misunderstanding of where guys are coming from and their true intent. There's too much personal attachment and offense is taken when it seems like someone is talking bad about your prized item.

All that said, I do appreciate you sharing that, Muddy. I appreciate your perspective and it's nice seeing a post that better addresses the original post. Thank you.
 
I am talking about all products including Hammers. But to stay on Hammers, have your say and move on. That is my point. There is no misunderstanding of where guys are coming from. The intent of many of the "recommendations" may be admirable but the failure to accept a company's decision is the point I am making. If any company doesn't want to accept the recommendations, criticisms etc, that is their business decision not anyone elses. Don't get your butt hurt if a company chooses not to accept whatever is presented. If you do not have a financial stake in a company, you have zero input to business decisions of financial consequence. Once the information is shared its obvious "the" company has made their decision. This is the issue, people do not want to move on. It doesn't matter who is "right" or "wrong", failure to accept a company's decision and just keep slamming your shoe on the table to get attention is the main point I am trying to make. It becomes personal to make sure everyone "knows" who is "right" and who is "wrong". Why? A recommendation was rejected and a company has made a decision to run their business the way they want. Move on. Choose another product.
 
I am talking about all products including Hammers. But to stay on Hammers, have your say and move on. That is my point. There is no misunderstanding of where guys are coming from. The intent of many of the "recommendations" may be admirable but the failure to accept a company's decision is the point I am making. If any company doesn't want to accept the recommendations, criticisms etc, that is their business decision not anyone elses. Don't get your butt hurt if a company chooses not to accept whatever is presented. If you do not have a financial stake in a company, you have zero input to business decisions of financial consequence. Once the information is shared its obvious "the" company has made their decision. This is the issue, people do not want to move on. It doesn't matter who is "right" or "wrong", failure to accept a company's decision and just keep slamming your shoe on the table to get attention is the main point I am trying to make. It becomes personal to make sure everyone "knows" who is "right" and who is "wrong". Why? A recommendation was rejected and a company has made a decision to run their business the way they want. Move on. Choose another product.
It's not just about the company and the company owners though. That's only one part of it and not always even a factor in the things addressed in the OP.
 
I also think, with respect, it's unfair and unacceptable to say that if a product doesn't work for you that you should simply move on. If there's room for improvement or you think there's a serious issue worth addressing and hopefully get fixed for the betterment of everyone that uses it, wouldn't that be worth mentioning and pushing for? A person is really just supposed to be like, "oh well, I'll just use something else. Sucks to be the next guy"? It's a serious question and again I'm not trying to be a jerk here. I'm quite calm as I type this and am just trying to make my point.
Just a point or two to help with consumer protection.
1. List the projectile/s and what they issue is with each. Or is it all versions of all calibers
2. List the proposed solution to the issue.
a. Machining or material improvement to the maker
b. Enhancement to the end user i.e. drill the tips or wax the tips etc.
3. Identify which steps have been taken to inform the manufacturer and aid in a cure/detailed solutions proposed and progress to date.

There may be more detail that could be added, but at this point potential users are made aware and the remaining battle could be taken up with the owners if you really want to help them fix the serious issues listed. Continuing the fight in the public forum over multiple threads is not improving any bullets performance. I can gather that If I am to shoot the 154 HHT I need my impact velocity to stay over 1900FPS. I also gather that I may want to look elsewhere for a DG bullet. I am left with the impression that there is not a bullet in the entire Hammer lineup that can be relied upon.
Without a list of solutions to the suggested issues it's just complaining. If the there is a list and it has been ignored, you have your answer from the manufacturer and done your duty to protect your fellow consumer. At that point, which was 3 threads ago, what is the need to continue this in a public forum if not to undermine?
 
Just a point or two to help with consumer protection.
1. List the projectile/s and what they issue is with each. Or is it all versions of all calibers
2. List the proposed solution to the issue.
a. Machining or material improvement to the maker
b. Enhancement to the end user i.e. drill the tips or wax the tips etc.
3. Identify which steps have been taken to inform the manufacturer and aid in a cure/detailed solutions proposed and progress to date.

There may be more detail that could be added, but at this point potential users are made aware and the remaining battle could be taken up with the owners if you really want to help them fix the serious issues listed. Continuing the fight in the public forum over multiple threads is not improving any bullets performance. I can gather that If I am to shoot the 154 HHT I need my impact velocity to stay over 1900FPS. I also gather that I may want to look elsewhere for a DG bullet. I am left with the impression that there is not a bullet in the entire Hammer lineup that can be relied upon.
Without a list of solutions to the suggested issues it's just complaining. If the there is a list and it has been ignored, you have your answer from the manufacturer and done your duty to protect your fellow consumer. At that point, which was 3 threads ago, what is the need to continue this in a public forum if not to undermine?
Is it not asking too much to offer your opinion on solutions? Couldn't that be perceived as saying you know more? I do agree that if you found a solution or something to seemingly fix an issue, that should be shared and offered for consideration.

It sounds to me like you have gotten something from the threads and posts talking about concerns with things like advertised minimum impact velocity and potential issues with DG varieties, so there is merit to the posts and threads it would seem. I think I have seen numerous times where guys that have stated concerns, myself included, also state its not with every Hammer bullet. I can't recall a circumstance where anyone has said they're all bad and can't be trusted. That's just what was perceived, which is unfortunate.

Some may not like it or appreciate it, and I get that, but I still think there's merit to these threads and posts. It's new information to some each and every time. One could argue that for those that it's not new information and it doesn't apply to them could simple move on or scroll on, yes? Just another thought.

Either way, you do make good points and I'm not trying to dismiss them or invalidate them. I'm just offering some counterpoints. Thank you for your insight and addition to the discussion.
 
Last edited:

Recent Posts

Top