therifleman556
Well-Known Member
It was my understanding you do not want too fine of a finish in your chamber. Akin to having lube on your brass & it doesn't grip the chamber wall increasing bolt thrust.
I don't know who posted that, but it wasn't me. Is there another member with the same name.You don't have a CLUE what the real cost are!!!
MudRunner, what got Remington was Walker showed them a design change that would cost $0.05 to alleviate problem. Remington turned it down. You may live out west and only take long shots with plenty of time to chamber a round. There's a hunt we usually do midday in the south after a morning of still hunting it's call jump shooting. Deer love to bed in cutover areas. You & a buddy spread out and walk the cutover. Deer are going to jump up and be running full speed immediately. You probably have 2 or 3 seconds at most to raise rifle, aim, and fire. I have no idea how many one shot kills I made that way. You have to have round chambered with the safety on. I didn't consider myself an idiot because I bought a rifle that the safety is supposed to function properly. I've never been around an accident, but I can see how it could happen with a manufacturer knowingly selling defective rifles. The problem with people and companies is that most don't want to be held accountable for their own actions. When I wake in the morning and look in the mirror. The person I see is the only person that is responsible and accountable for the decisions I make that day. The same applies to those Remington execs.Yes, but people only died because of negligence and pure stupidity. First, who leaves a rifle unattended that is loaded, cocked, and then goes walking around in front of it as if it's inert? A complete idiot. Who keeps a loaded, cocked, and on safe rifle in a horse trailer compartment where it can only lay 1 direction, and could get bumped around, and because if you open one side, it might be pointing directly at you when it does get bumped and go off? Once again, negligence and stupidity.
You can't blame that on Remington... But guess what? They did! And their lawyers ate it up! And just like that stupid McDonald's coffee lady, the injustice system absolved the idiots of all of their stupidity and blame, and put it squarely on the big corporation.
Semper Fi. I live in Alabama. I know how to deer hunt, done it my whole life. I know what jump-shooting is, it's the same thing as what we call "stalk-hunting". I also used to hunt with dogs running deer. This is all irrelevant information on both of our parts, because it does not pertain to the situations that were used to sue Remington.MudRunner, what got Remington was Walker showed them a design change that would cost $0.05 to alleviate problem. Remington turned it down. You may live out west and only take long shots with plenty of time to chamber a round. There's a hunt we usually do midday in the south after a morning of still hunting it's call jump shooting. Deer love to bed in cutover areas. You & a buddy spread out and walk the cutover. Deer are going to jump up and be running full speed immediately. You probably have 2 or 3 seconds at most to raise rifle, aim, and fire. I have no idea how many one shot kills I made that way. You have to have round chambered with the safety on. I didn't consider myself an idiot because I bought a rifle that the safety is supposed to function properly. I've never been around an accident, but I can see how it could happen with a manufacturer knowingly selling defective rifles. The problem with people and companies is that most don't want to be held accountable for their own actions. When I wake in the morning and look in the mirror. The person I see is the only person that is responsible and accountable for the decisions I make that day. The same applies to those Remington execs.
This didn't come from a liberal. I was trapping beaver for a $5 bounty at 12. At 17 years and 1-1/2 weeks old I may have been the youngest person in boot camp at PI, USMC VV Era. I live on a farm, have my own shooting range, and am having 2 customs being built right now.
Semper Fi. I live in Alabama. I know how to deer hunt, done it my whole life. I know what jump-shooting is, it's the same thing as what we call "stalk-hunting". I also used to hunt with dogs running deer. This is all irrelevant information on both of our parts, because it does not pertain to the situations that were used to sue Remington.
That $0.05 fix was not what caused these incidents, that was Mike's pre-thought out CYA to avoid getting involved in a lawsuit. The triggers, when adjusted properly, by someone with the right knowledge, have no issue...I own quite a few of them, I do my own trigger jobs, as I've done for the last 16+ years, because I was taught how to do so, by a professional gunsmith.
The 2 situations that were mainly used to sue Remington were the horse trailer incident (loaded rifle, kept on safe, got bumped and went off), and the rifle left alone on the shooting bench incident (cocked, loaded, on safe, people walking around in front of it, someone clicked safety off, it went BOOM!). Both of these incidents were purely idiotic negligence and poor firearms safety handling, and ended up causing someone to lose their life. And, the shooting bench incident guy later (after getting his guilt-money) admitted that he had tinkered with the trigger in an attempt to do a trigger job prior to the incident happening.
I'm not debating either. I'm pointing out facts. Whether Remington was at fault for the mechanically failed parts, or not, here's how I see it.MudRunner, I regret responding to this post. I joined to learn, not get into debates. I wish you the very best and honor your right to your opinion. My opinion wasn't formed by a TV show. It was formed by owning one that went off. No damage was done because of respect of where a rifle is pointed. That and the 100's of settled cases by Remington. I retired from a large company. They don't settle unless absolutely positive they will lose. My thoughts all go back to my belief that we are all accountable and responsible for our own decisions. Wishing you a good night.
Tikka is owned by Beretta... Their CS is horrible. Heard of a few Bergaras having some issues, as well...Chambers, firing pins, etc...
Anything man-made has a chance for being defective...Especially anything mass-produced. Nothing is perfect 100% of the time.
The only reason new Remingtons have to replace the triggers is because stupid people killed their family members or friends by their own negligence, and their lawyers took advantage of the crooked [in]justice system here in America, and sued them. So, now Remington has to produce crappy lawyer-proof triggers. So, everyone who complains about Remington's crappy triggers, or why they need replacing immediately, they can blame the dumbasses that killed their friends and family members from their own stupidity and negligence, and then blamed Remington. And to keep from getting sued himself, Mike Walker had to "admit" that the old triggers were "defective" on camera in a 60 Minutes interview. Which I thought was complete crap, and nothing more than an anti-gun propaganda hit piece.
Sorry you are not correct. I know people who worked there when this was going on. Was even discussed at Staff Meetings. It was real pull your head out of the sand. Unfortunately was all about $$$$$'s..