• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

Think I have run into a problem here!!!

Not that I know anything at all about this, but if I put all your posted data plus a barametric pressure of 29.25 Hg in Load From A Disk I get 115 MOA ...

That will cause the corrected BC to go to 0.71 and require more MOA.

Is it possible the pressure was 29.25 Hg?

Doug

See e-mail ...
 
Fifty
Couple of thoughts.
#1 I am surprised you haven't adopted the practice of keeping the rounds in you're inside shirt pocket.Seams to keep the velocities even for me.
#2 Don't know about your Wild but mine needs recalibrating with much of a temperature change.My Wild come with a real dark lens that I use to calibrate it to the sun.Not sure if this is the best way but it seams to keep it reading consistently for me.The Wild gets real touchy at that range too,I usually take three readings and average?
Still 25MOA is a lot???????
 
Problem found!!!!

Today I was able to take some time at lunch and set up my Wild rangefinder and check it against my Swarovski laser rangefinder. This is usually how I check the Wilds calibration as the swari will reach out to 2K in good ranging conditions.

To day was not the best conditions to range but I used a corner of a shop across from our property to range. Set the Swari to the meter reading setting and got five readings off the shop, 1072, 1073, 1072, 1072, 1071 meters.

Then set up the Wild and took several readings with it and got the following: 1011, 1010, 1012 and 1015 meters.

So at this range, the Wild is basically reading 60 meters short. If this error held true which it may or may not at longer ranges. I would suspect the error would even increase at longer ranges with this type of rangefinder but even if it stayed consistant this pretty much solves the mystery.

I was set up shooting at a measured 2450 meters measured from the Wild range finder. After finding that the Wild is ranging short, if it holds consistant over this range, the actual measurement in meters would be more like 2595 meters.

In yards, I was shooting for 2680 yards and in reality, the gong was more like 2840 yards away. A difference of roughly 160 yards which at that range is very significant.

Combine that error in range measurement with the fact that the actual muzzle velocity was probably more like 3350 fps instead of the 3395 fps used in the Exbal program and things come into focus and look much more logical as to why the shots dropped so low from the start.

Time to recalibrate my rangefinder and see if I can get her to match up with the Swari again. She was last summer so it must have gotten knocked out of calibration or the colder temps have something to do with it.

Thanks for your time and help, I think the problem has been found!!!

Kirby Allen(50)
 
Re: Problem found!!!!

Interesting, but I am drawn to ask a question. Has the other (Swarovski) unit been calibrated as well?

Would/is it possible to maybe obtain a US Geological survey map of your area and combine it with a GPS unit to plot the distances and verify your readings that way?

Another rough gestimation might be bouncing it off of your come ups on your elevation based off of a table and see if you are in the ball park that way. I/E 200 minutes of angle increase in elevation on that cartridge yeilds a theoretical zero of 2500 yards. . . If you were within a couple minutes of what it suggested, it might back up your other findings.

(or cause even more "scratching head syndrome.)

Makes this stuff so much fun!

Just a thought. . .
 
Re: Problem found!!!!

Since I have never shot at a distance where the bullet went subsonic I can't say what would happen, but it seems that your bullet past the transonic zone somewhere between 2400 and 2500 yards.

Does Exbal calculate any effect of this?

thanks,

edge.
 
Re: Problem found!!!!

NesikaChad,

I have tested the Swari from one full section fence line to another across a stubble field that was about as flat as muy desk top!!

Put a truck on one fence line, drove to the other and took some range measurements off the truck. Came within 5 yards of a mile on every measurement. I was actually surpises the fence lines were that close to on!!!

I then tested the Wild against the Swar out to 2000 yards and they were on the money at that time. Something must have knocked the Wild out of calibration.

Thanks for the recommendations, I guess great minds and crazy people think alike!! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif Using those two groups of people I do not offend you while correctly representing myself!! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/blush.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif!!

Kirby Allen(50)
 
Re: Problem found!!!!

At my altitude my predicitons are a bit more range then this at supersonic velocity. Around 2600 yards at my altitude.

I do not believe Exbal does not take into acount any change in bullet flight under supersonic velocity compared to over.

Kirby Allen(50)
 
Re: Problem found!!!!

I figured as far as your shooting, the rotation of the earth could move the target that much between the shot and impact, try shooting north instead of west LOL! glad ya figured it out kirby.
JS
 
Re: Problem found!!!!

James,

No, ya see, if I shoot north or south, the **** bullet moves to much by the time the bullet gets there. I think its windage issues but the earth is just moving the target away!!!

If I shoot to the east, when I shoot the target is at X yards but when the bullet gets there it is at X+Z yards because the earth is rolling the target away from me!!!

West is the only way to go, when I shoot, the earth will actually bring the target closer to me!!! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif

Those that are way to serious out there, this is a joke!!!

Kirby Allen(50)
 
Re: Problem found!!!!

Went and talked to my cousin that owns the land where we do our long range shooting. He pulled out his survey maps and we did some figuring. If you can believe it, the yardage came out to 2861 yards from the point I shot to the point where the gong was at.

Never hurts to set up and shoot from fence lines!! With just a little math its easy to figure out the range.

Recalibrated the Wild and ready for the next attemps. We also mapped out a place to place the gong that will get me right on at 3K yards!!! Should be interesting. Colder then hell now though so will have to wait for a few days, work to be done anyway!! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif

Kirby Allen(50)
 
Re: Problem found!!!!

One interesting thing I did not mention before. The hill where I set the gong up on had around 2 dozen gopher holes on it. I think you know where I am going with this come spring time!!! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif

Of course a mature gopher in this area is about the size of a pop can!!! not a real big target but a qualifying target none the less

Kirby Allen(50)
 
Re: Problem found!!!!

Kirby, I've also found that when the Moon is above, I get less drop due to its gravitational pull. Have you seen that as well? The heavier the bullet the more noticeable it becomes. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif

Don
 
Re: Problem found!!!!

[ QUOTE ]
I've also found that when the Moon is above, I get less drop due to its gravitational pull. Have you seen that as well? The heavier the bullet the more noticeable it becomes.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have noticed the same thing but backwards. The lighter the bullets the more noticable it becomes. Do you think this has something to do with being so close to the north pole?? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif
 
Warning! This thread is more than 18 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top