Mike Matteson
Well-Known Member
I have watch over the great many years, that new case come out. When from long action to shorter action, and even shorter actions. Belted action rule for years. Now it's beltless cases. Each time they would say look at my new case. It's faster and noting their velocity. They do their comparison with their 26" barrel to a 24" barrel. Their powder charge is anywhere 5 to 15 grains above the other rifles too. So you can get a powder burner, and work up from there. You get a few hundred fps out of it. Using belted mag with equal barrel lengths closest the velocity different down, with less powder. So with powder being harder to get at times and getting 10 to 15 rounds less per lbs of powder and for what. Not much. I see the turning up the rifling speed to spend the bullets up for longer range. They only loading one round at at time, because the mag is to short to handle the overall length of the round doesn't really work for hunting, because sometimes needing a second round or more. Their's 7000 grains per pound of powder / grains per load = rounds per lbs. Now I haven't built a longer range rifle yet, but thinking about very hard. It will be built on a long action for sure, with a M.B. too.