JohnWess
Well-Known Member
I certainly appreciate that and you are right, I shouldn't equate wounding an animal to a 2 MOA rifle to wounding an animal. I am not saying I can't would an animal with my best rifle. It has happened. I am saying that, all else being equal, the .25 MOA rifle in your example has a lower probability of wounding an animal than the 2 MOA rifle.The issue is equating an arbitrary value of a 2 MOA gun with wounding an animal. Think it can't be done with your ".25 moa" rifle? Especially now that everyone that has lucked into one good group has a tack driver.