Cuz
Well-Known Member
I have 2 tbac 338 suppressors, 2 ultra 9's and have used them on .223 to 338 norma. They have performed fine. The sound reduction is great, but the recoil reduction is an added bonus.
I know the 7" is listed at 11.5oz, does that feel like a lot of weight on the end of the barrel?
I can only afford one right now and everyone seems to overly favor TBAC. That makes it easy knowing which company to buy from. Now it's what model! I would love to but the 5" because of how small and light it is, but sounds like most guys say 7" is the shortest they would ever go. If I'm shooting rocks or steel I'm going to use ear protection anyways, and if I'm hunting I shouldn't need more than a few shots protection. Keep us updated on how the 5" works out for you.The 9" is a bit heavier but for me the real difference is when you get you'st the the 7'', the 9'' seems really long.
I have 2 Ultra 5's on order for hunting rifles. I can only imagine how much better they will be than the Ultra 7 in the field. The Ultra 5's will be louder but im not worried about it for single shots or even a follow up shot.
I've talked to Ladd hall from western precision rifles quite a bit about them. He loves them and swears by them. Not sure if he is paid to do that though...The ballista does look impressive and is rated for 29db vs 20 with the amtec, and its lighter.