lancetkenyon
Well-Known Member
I have the 95mm too. It sees way past legal hunting light as it is.I have the 95mm and my buddy has the 115.....side by side the 95 is a tick darker. All of them are nothing short of amamazing.
I have the 95mm too. It sees way past legal hunting light as it is.I have the 95mm and my buddy has the 115.....side by side the 95 is a tick darker. All of them are nothing short of amamazing.
WHERE does the older zeiss diascope 85 FL wind up in the comparison chart? i've never been able to put mine side by side with the swaro's.If you can't see the difference between a Viper and Razor you either have amazingly poor eyesight or amazingly great eyesight, I'm not sure which.
Some buddies and I got together to compare spotting scopes side by side at 1300yrds....The scopes were Kowa TSN-883 Prominar...NF TS82(Meopta)....Vortex Razor...........it was pretty much a wash between the Kowa and the NF with the slight edge going to the NF. For dollars spent the Razor did very well........Nothing I've seen compares to the Swaro BTX.
WHERE does the older zeiss diascope 85 FL wind up in the comparison chart? i've never been able to put mine side by side with the swaro's.
one thing that turned me off of the swarvoski was the body focus, i had a nightforce spotter and the body focus was hard to use to focus far away cause my hands would jiggle the scope,, with the zeiss i can just barely touch the little focus knob on top
That's exactly how I am too, do a lot of research before I buy something because I don't want to regret buying it. I like the buy once cry once motto especially when it comes to opticsAnd if you're like me, and you re-search the hell out of everything and you're always looking to see, what's the closest thing to swarovski…… Just save the money for that extra year too and be done. It's totally worth it.
WHERE does the older zeiss diascope 85 FL wind up in the comparison chart? i've never been able to put mine side by side with the swaro's.
one thing that turned me off of the swarvoski was the body focus, i had a nightforce spotter and the body focus was hard to use to focus far away cause my hands would jiggle the scope,, with the zeiss i can just barely touch the little focus knob on top
I have the Diascope 85 as well. I haven't been able to compare side by side with Swarovski, but I have looked through both. The difference is in the coatings, as both are Schott glass. I prefer the Zeiss over the Swarovski, but it comes down to personal preference. The contrast on the Zeiss tends to be cooler. It's easier on my eyes. That being said, my scope is currently in Germany. I lost the fine focus. They couldn't repair it on this side of the pond...WHERE does the older zeiss diascope 85 FL wind up in the comparison chart? i've never been able to put mine side by side with the swaro's.
one thing that turned me off of the swarvoski was the body focus, i had a nightforce spotter and the body focus was hard to use to focus far away cause my hands would jiggle the scope,, with the zeiss i can just barely touch the little focus knob on top
A decent moon and I can see half-way decent with my 10x42 SLCs. I was blown away the first time I did that. The next summer I bought the ATX 65, someday I'll add a 95mm obj and upgrade to the NLs. Big .I have the 95mm too. It sees way past legal hunting light as it is.
You have been to the top of the White Tanks?
Or the Saguaro in general, as in AZ.
I was sitting on the top of Barry Goldwater Peak for those photos.I've done unit 32 for elk. Closest to Saguaro I've been for hunting I think.
Yep sure have. I've hunted 42 around Barry Goldwater. Past camp goat.