Shawn Gun Porn Please

260shooter

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
304
Location
South Illinois
Shawn

Could you give us a pic of your equipment you used to win the Nationals with? Along with the usual scope power, barrel lenght, load type stuff /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif.

Thanks

Bill
 
its supposed to mean "bump this thread" but back to top works too i guess /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 
Sorry guys. I tried to find my 260 photos but couldn't. I will get some here very soon ( a day or 2 ). Until then here are the specs:
Remington 700 LH, SA, CS
HS Precision LH sporter Pro Series
Harris 9-13", "S" bipod with Pod-Loc
DE Cheekpiece (of course)
DE oversized bolt knob
HS Precision box mags
custom bolt with Sako extractor / no spring ejector
Mauser bolt release and fixed blade ejector
NF 20 MOA base
NF LW rings
NF 3-15 NXS w/NP-R2
Hart 26" barrel 1-9 integeral DE brake
Teflon /Moly OD Green
Holland resprung trigger
Mar-Tex skim bedded

Load:
Rem brass
CCI BR2
Hodgon H4350
Hornady 140 AMAX
2820 fps

Shoots tiny, tiny, groups.
 
For those of you in need of your competition gun porn, here it is. The biggest mod that you probably never see anywhere else is the addition of the Mauser bolt stop and fixed blade ejector. It provides a solid bolt stop and positive ejection (an idea that popped into my head late one night).



260-1.JPG

260-3.JPG

260-2.JPG
 
Dude, your ACI fell off!

No, really though thats a sweet rifle. Thanks for the pics and specs.
I'm really thinking about a 260 or 243 for my next build.
May be a 260, since the inaccurate myth is being disproven /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif.
 
The ACI didn't fall off I took it off because if you are backwards like me and try to mount it in a convential manner the numbers are upside down. I have taken a 30 mm VS ring and mounted it on the scope itself now. I left the base onn for the time being to prevent having to take the scope off. I will however get it off some day to prevent the "dork factor".
 
Warning! This thread is more than 19 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top