Ok this is a thread that has been posted 8 million times, but I'm asking anyway. I'm rifle rich and scope poor. I'm tired of messing around with budget optics and want toughness and reliability in turrets. #1 priority is tracking reliability/repeatibility, #2 toughness, #3 glass quality.
Here's what I've got:
Remington 700 semi custom .243
Remington 700 semi custom .260
Savage 110 semi custom .308
Remington 700 semi custom .338 Lapua
Semi custom is the works, HS precision stocks, full blue print, shilen barrels, etcs. I need 4 scopes for these rifles. Primary use will be long range steel busting, hunting, and PRS. There are an overwhelming amount of scope options and every option I have researched has positives and negatives which only confuses me more. This is what I've narrowed it down to:
SWFA 3x15x42mm FFP MOA
Nightforce SHV 4x14x50 FFP MOA
Viper Vortex (not sure on model, just need FFP MOA)
Luepold VX3I LRP 4x16x50mm FFP MOA
These 4 options with my mil discount keep them right around $600-$800 for each scope. I want to keep all the scopes the same for each rifle for famaliraty purposes.
So after my long rant which scope would you choose and why???? Thanks for the help and I love this forum.
I thought you were done with budget optics? everything you listed is a budget optic to someone else.
Personally, I'm ok with these scopes for everyday purpose. They work, i just thought id get you mind working. If you are unsure about the difference between a Vortex PST 5-20 mil/mil ebr whatever, and a schmit and bender pm2 you need to look more into it.
They all have their pros and cons, a lot of it should fit what you are doing. For instances have you looked at how many mils or moa of adjustment total that each scopes have? whats your max ranges are you shooting, are you using a 20 or 30 moa base? will you have enough ups to make it to where you are shooting. I'm not a PRS competitor, but i do have a background for as they say "tactical shooting" that might be more of durability, light and color, ability to have a ranging reticle as an option and of course tracking. For hunting, i use the same qualities from what im use to, with tactical rifles, because...im use it it. However for target shooting a lot of guys like more magnification. Its not necessary, and can throw your poi off as the reticle gets bigger and increases in moa in the scope, depending on how you zero. Sometimes when shooting a smaller target and ridiculous distances the reticle being 1 moa now, covers that target that is 2 moa in radius, so you can probably to that math of potential error with the reticle alone. Some people like a busy reticle, like the horus type reticle, some like old traditional mildot, some like some of the crazy proprietary reticles that you have to learn.
Basicly, despite what a bunch of people are about to tell you, based on whatever it is they do... the right, cartridge, rifle, setup, scope etc, is all you. what matches what you do and how you do it, the accessories you are willing to have or not have etc.