When Sauer phased out the 202 they introduced the 404 and the cheaper 101. Both of these new models have a decocking device on the rear of the bolt rather than a safety and it doesn't appear to have been very popular. The 404 is a swap barrel like the Blaser. The 101 has a heat shrunk barrel that can't be replaced when it is worn out. The 100 IMO is a much better design, it has the same style of 3 lug bolt that the 202 had, a 3 position safety and a barrel that is threaded into the receiver the good old fashion way. I have 3 Sauer 202 rifles and they all shoot 1/2 MOA groups or better. Here in NZ the Sauer 100 is cheaper than the Tikka T3 . For the price I think they are a real good buy. No I don't work for Sauer or any of their associated companies. I hope that helps.