Just started working on 7mm Mag again after a decade of not having one. The newish 175 ELD-X and 180 ELD-M bullets are near magical. Particularly the 180 ELD-M. Based on LabRadar data, I've calculated the B.C. of both bullets, and the 175 will fully stabilize in my 1:9.5 twist, but the M is coming in short on B.C. (and erratic), though it seems to group pretty good.
With a 1:8 or 8.5 twist, you will have a 0.401 G7 B.C. (0.796 G1) bullet, which you can drive upwards of 2900 fps easily in a 24" tube, perhaps approaching 3000 fps in a 26" barrel.
For perspective on why this thing is near magical, in a 12 lb rifle, spring weather, 2500 ft elevation...
225 ELD-M in 300 RUM - ~2950 fps, 0.777 B.C., 37.1 ftlbs recoil, supersonic to ~1980 yds
285 ELD-M in 338 Lapua - ~2850 fps, 0.829 B.C., 42.5 ftlbs recoil, supersonic to ~2020 yds
208 ELD-M in 300 WM - ~2900 fps, 0.690 B.C., 24.1 ftlbs recoil, supersonic to ~1720 yds
180 ELD-M in 7mm RM - ~2950 fps, 0.796 B.C., 18.9 ftlbs recoil, supersonic to ~2020 yds
Ballistically, the thing is hanging right in there with ultra mags, but at half the recoil and probably half the cost per round. It's even outrunning the venerable 300 Win Mag. Obviously it doesn't have the horsepower of the bigger bores, but in terms of wind/drop it's equal or better.
7mm mag has millions of options for factory ammo and reloading components, and with the aforementioned 175 ELD-X (0.689 B.C.) it will flatten an elk out past 700 yds. Stick a 140 or 160 class bullet in there, and you've got a laser-death-ray for deer out to 400 yds.
Granted, this is all based on the hope that the 180 ELD-M will shoot well in your custom barrel, but that's not a long shot bet. I've tried 5 different ELD-M's, in 3 calibers, and they've grouped as well or better than any other bullet.
Good stuff here, have you compared ft.lbs. of energy at say 1K yards? to me Its all kind of a mute point though, an elk @ 600 yards won't really know the difference of a well placed shot between the 4 cartridges listed.
I am in the process of finalizing my load, but have the 180 ELD-M shooting accurately around 3,000 fps out of my 26" 1:8T stainless Criterion barreled 7mm RM. It was pretty easy to get it to shoot well.Just started working on 7mm Mag again after a decade of not having one. The newish 175 ELD-X and 180 ELD-M bullets are near magical. Particularly the 180 ELD-M. Based on LabRadar data, I've calculated the B.C. of both bullets, and the 175 will fully stabilize in my 1:9.5 twist, but the M is coming in short on B.C. (and erratic), though it seems to group pretty good.
With a 1:8 or 8.5 twist, you will have a 0.401 G7 B.C. (0.796 G1) bullet, which you can drive upwards of 2900 fps easily in a 24" tube, perhaps approaching 3000 fps in a 26" barrel.
For perspective on why this thing is near magical, in a 12 lb rifle, spring weather, 2500 ft elevation...
225 ELD-M in 300 RUM - ~2950 fps, 0.777 B.C., 37.1 ftlbs recoil, supersonic to ~1980 yds
285 ELD-M in 338 Lapua - ~2850 fps, 0.829 B.C., 42.5 ftlbs recoil, supersonic to ~2020 yds
208 ELD-M in 300 WM - ~2900 fps, 0.690 B.C., 24.1 ftlbs recoil, supersonic to ~1720 yds
180 ELD-M in 7mm RM - ~2950 fps, 0.796 B.C., 18.9 ftlbs recoil, supersonic to ~2020 yds
Ballistically, the thing is hanging right in there with ultra mags, but at half the recoil and probably half the cost per round. It's even outrunning the venerable 300 Win Mag. Obviously it doesn't have the horsepower of the bigger bores, but in terms of wind/drop it's equal or better.
7mm mag has millions of options for factory ammo and reloading components, and with the aforementioned 175 ELD-X (0.689 B.C.) it will flatten an elk out past 700 yds. Stick a 140 or 160 class bullet in there, and you've got a laser-death-ray for deer out to 400 yds.
Granted, this is all based on the hope that the 180 ELD-M will shoot well in your custom barrel, but that's not a long shot bet. I've tried 5 different ELD-M's, in 3 calibers, and they've grouped as well or better than any other bullet.
I am in the process of finalizing my load, but have the 180 ELD-M shooting accurately around 3,000 fps out of my 26" 1:8T stainless Criterion barreled 7mm RM. It was pretty easy to get it to shoot well.
Barrel life will be less than a 300 Win Mag all other things being equal, the 264 is more overbore. Can't say for sure how long a barrel will last for you, probably not more than 1,200, but just a guess.two for the .264 WinMag and if I am not mistaken the extra muzzle brake I had for the Creedmoor rifles with work and the bullets will all work. How is the barrel life with this round is it similar to the 300 Win Mag?
I don't run brakes on my 7mm Rem Mag's. My Savage with the Criterion weighs about 11.5lbs scoped and with a make shift cheek rest and a limbsaver recoil pad, I can shoot it all day.The recoil energy of the 7mm has gotten my attention thank you for your chart. I really like that it is the same bullet type for an Apples to Apples comparison. The bullet weight at a 180 grain is the same weight I use for my 300 WM. for Elk my elevation is about 2500-3000 ft higher in Colorado, but thanks I appreciate the feedback. Do you use a muzzle brake on your rifle?
After doing some comparisons yesterday on boxed ammunition choices and availability of reloading components (brass mainly) available locally here decided that between the .264 win mag and the 7mm rem mag, I decided on the 7mm Rem Mag I don't have a currently have anything in 7mm. I have a limbsaver already on my stock. Will still get the barrel threaded.I don't run brakes on my 7mm Rem Mag's. My Savage with the Criterion weighs about 11.5lbs scoped and with a make shift cheek rest and a limbsaver recoil pad, I can shoot it all day.