shortgrass
Well-Known Member
Anybody that'd fit a detachable mag system to a 'classic' Mauser '98 would probably..............
Shortgrass got it correct - with the addition of finding a way to keep the cartridge to the front of the magazine & shortening the follower. Will not be a simple task!All the Blackburn bottom metal and follower will do is allow 3 'down' instead of the 2 that most Mauser magazines will, and give you a hinged floor plate with an 'in the bow' release. The Mauser feeds "off the rails", that's where the alterations need to take place, and the feed ramp, too. The radius on the under side of the feed rails may need to be increased to allow for the larger diameter cartridges. There are no feed lips on a Mauser magazine to tweak. The OP didn't specify if his actions were 'commercial' '98s, or military, just "custom" ,,, which covers a wide swath.
Feed lips on a Mauser '98??Bend the feed lips is the mag. Make sure the back of the mag is open enough so the bolt catches properly. Front is open enough to tip the cartridge up slightly so the bullet is pointing toward the chamber.
If you read the snotty response above you'll see I was corrected. Forgot these were fed via the action vs a mag. I've been around a few conversion with a mag and didn't even think about the original design. Clearly stepped on some toes and only meant to help.Feed lips on a Mauser '98??
Shortgrass got it correct - with the addition of finding a way to keep the cartridge to the front of the magazine & shortening the follower. Will not be a simple task!
Sorry, didn't mean to sound "snotty". Just didn't understand what you were referring to.If you read the snotty response above you'll see I was corrected. Forgot these were fed via the action vs a mag. I've been around a few conversion with a mag and didn't even think about the original design. Clearly stepped on some toes and only meant to help.
Yes, unfortunate, but some smiths will try to do anything you ask for.Its unfortunate this happened to the O.P, its really unfortunate his smith didn't warn him of the problem in the beginning.
Thats fine as long as they explain the short comings then its customers choice.Yes, unfortunate, but some smiths will try to do anything you ask for.
I made the same mistake on my first "varmint" gun when I was a teenager. Had a Mauser '98 and had a 22-250 barrel installed. If the magazine was stacked perfectly & all rounds pushed forward as far as possible it would feed a few rounds. But the recoil would tend to push then toward the rear of the follower; then it became a single shot bolt gun, or very unpredictable.
Yup, it takes a talented GS to know how to modify the feed rails for a larger round or a rimmed round. If you remove too much in the wrong place, your screwed.My first 6.5x300wsm was built on a 77 tanger 7 mag that my smith explained to me what he was gonna have to do to get it to feed then I agreed. But atleast he told me up front and was confident in his ability and it did just fine.
He had to work on the ramp, lips and follower.
Are you kidding me?Bend the feed lips is the mag. Make sure the back of the mag is open enough so the bolt catches properly. Front is open enough to tip the cartridge up slightly so the bullet is pointing toward the chamber.
And if you get it to work, there is no going back to standard.Yup, it takes a talented GS to know how to modify the feed rails for a larger round or a rimmed round. If you remove too much in the wrong place, your screwed.