stljc2
Well-Known Member
Thanks Tiny Tim for your input. Yup Elmer and I agree. But, of course, I always strive for the best I can do.I think we always have to ask ourselves what our priorities are. There are always trade offs. For competition, ultimately, consistency is king. A couple hundred fps at a known distance means little and a higher round count is desirable. For a hunting rifle, that speed helps cover variables in situation such as an animal moving a few steps after ranging or when using a nearby object to range because our equipment cant reliably range a relatively non-reflecive target.
Elmer Kieth (I think) is reported to have said, "Efficiency be *rule 4 violation*, its results we're after".
And as dmagna pointed out, a hunting rifle may last 30 years regardless. Just my .02.
I don't utilize a rangefinder (except the old method of Average chest to withers in inches X MOA hashmarks / 95.5 for range estimation at least I think that's the formula haven't used it as of yet since mostly where I'm at anything over 200 yd is a rarity).