• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

Opinions on Noslers cartridge family

which nosler cartridge has the best chance of commercial viability?


  • Total voters
    72
I have a couple 28 Noslers, I have more invested in brass for them than I had in my first 2 hunting rifles!
 
Last edited:
I think the 33 may have a place as a heavy hitting close to mid range, when you want to knock something out of it's hooves in the timber, may fit in some action better than a 340 WBY, I could see building a wood stocked Winny with a #4 on it for timber crashing!!
The feed back from the 30 Nosler has been excellent, the one I dialed in for a customer showed some serious goodness!!
 
I like the 338 rum best really for a mag fed 338. I have a reamer set up with a short throat for 250s to feed in a wyatts. Problem is you cant find brass. The fast RL powders are great for speed, but I like to stay with H1000 for guns.
ADG is making 338 RUM brass, selling it on gunbroker.
I just got some 6.5 creed brass from them it looks pretty good
 
Nope, the BC is very similar between the 2 bullets and the 30 has a 200 fps advantage. Both of those bullets work very well on elk. Personally Im sticking with the 30. I have an edge and prefer the way the 215 works on elk vs the 300 hybrid. A 215 at 3100 is going to be hard to beat.
Alex, what powder are you using to reach 3100fps with a 215gr bullet in a 30 Nosler? I have a 28 Nosler and use RL33 to reach 3050fps with the 195gr bullet, I had tried H1000 in the beginning and could only get it to 2900fps.
 
I think the 33 may have a place as a heavy hitting close to mid range, when you want to knock something out of it's hooves in the timber, may fit in some action better than a 340 WBY, I could see building a wood stocked Winny with a #4 on it for timber crashing!!
The feed back from the 30 Nosler has been excellent, the one I dialed in for a customer showed some serious goodness!!
"Timber Crashing" I like that one :)
 
Warning! This thread is more than 8 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top