therifleman556
Well-Known Member
So far I've managed to not own a 270 hopefully I never have to
Unless it's the short mag.
So far I've managed to not own a 270 hopefully I never have to
That is fake news. The 270 with the same weight bullet still beats the creed to 500, and if the barrel twist rate on the 270 was faster than 1-10 and was able to hurl bullets of the same bc , the creed would really take a back seat to the old win. This is just from Thumbing through Ballistics tables. For the record I prefer a 6.5 swede and the 280 rem.thats all i have to say about that ( gump voice)
But they make a 7mm WSM and SAUM and SS, therefore the .270 versions are obsolete...Unless it's the short mag.
But they make a 7mm WSM (Browning) and SAUM (Who?) and SS (Not factory), therefore the .270 versions are obsolete...
I just cannot get excited as some people seem to be about the 6.5 creedmore. I have never been a real fan of the 243 either. I am speaking specifically about using these calibers at 4-500 plus yards. I think a heavier bullet and a bigger diameter is in order for long range shots on elk, moose, bear especially. Whitetail deer ok I guess but the wound channel may not be effective on marginal hit. Just my two cents. How do you other long range hunters feel about this?
I own one and I like everything about it. That being said it does not come with me on any hunting trips. Its a good caliber thats accurate and easy to load for but I hate when some idiot on TV takes one Elk hunting just to prove a point. I think that its irresponsible and stupid to shoot anything larger than a deer with one. Sure I can kill an Elk at 400 yards with my 223 but Im not dumb enough to try. Its nice though to have access to a wide selection of high quality factory ammo that feeds from a mag for those who don't reload.I just cannot get excited as some people seem to be about the 6.5 creedmore. I have never been a real fan of the 243 either. I am speaking specifically about using these calibers at 4-500 plus yards. I think a heavier bullet and a bigger diameter is in order for long range shots on elk, moose, bear especially. Whitetail deer ok I guess but the wound channel may not be effective on marginal hit. Just my two cents. How do you other long range hunters feel about this?
Spot on !!!Seriously right? It would be the first REAL contribution the creedmore made to society!! Lol