I find it interesting when reading and trying to understand the perspectives of individuals. Generally I believe many individuals attempt to justify why what they have is the best by discrediting the other options. I get that to a certain degree, but the over hype of some products and processes can get annoying. Separating real world performance from hype can only be done through objective testing given a specific set of parameters.
It really depends on the what the individual wants (personal preference). Do they want to jump on the band wagon with with the latest wave of new products, or do they want to be more of an outlier or traditionalist? There is nothing wrong with either camp as long as you can respect the individual's perspective and preference.
I applaud new product and process offerings. The hard part is separating real world objective results from individual bias. I put a great deal of weight on the opinions of individuals with experience and track records for objectivity like the OP.
It really depends on the what the individual wants (personal preference). Do they want to jump on the band wagon with with the latest wave of new products, or do they want to be more of an outlier or traditionalist? There is nothing wrong with either camp as long as you can respect the individual's perspective and preference.
I applaud new product and process offerings. The hard part is separating real world objective results from individual bias. I put a great deal of weight on the opinions of individuals with experience and track records for objectivity like the OP.