4xforfun
Well-Known Member
Much difference in glass quality? How about tracking. 5.5-22 vs 5 - 25
NXS was the only scope they made at one point. It's currently in the process of being discontinued, hardly the modern day flagship. I say that as a current NXS user.I vote NXS. Flagship Nightforce.
Gun I am building is for off the bench type shooting with bipod. Weight is my friend....except for , you know, dating and stuff.I think the ATACR is better optically but not by a huge amount. I seem to be able to get better clarity when it comes to detecting mirage via the parallax adjustment, but the doggone think is heavy.
Right. It was there flagship model for that reason( that it was all they needed/had at the time). Never said it still was. Only that I still enjoy using it. Others are obviously better but way more money. Hate to see the NXS line go but it will never be goneNXS was the only scope they made at one point. It's currently in the process of being discontinued, hardly the modern day flagship. I say that as a current NXS user.
Idk which came out before which…because I don't personally care, but I can tell you that the comp is a different scope all around, for the purpose it was designed for. Even more telling is it essentially replaced the old 12-42 BR.I didn't know that the NSX came before the old comp. What is better, or, what prompted them to produce the old comp I wonder. Must be a reason. In the LRBR world the 12 - 42 x 56 NSX is VERY popular.