WVRifleman
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2011
- Messages
- 74
The GOA, FPC, and a few others are the only one actually tying to fight for us...But the US SC is not letting them plead their cases.Well schitt, let's all quit the NRA and see how far that gets us. Who then, will be fighting for our 2A?
Maybe Hillary and Bernie will be the voice for us.
The GOA, FPC, and a few others are the only one actually tying to fight for us...But the US SC is not letting them plead their cases.
The NRA is not fighting for us at all the last 100 years...Instead they are helping write anti-gun legislation. The ONLY times they fight are in states that are already draconian and super strict & liberal, like California, NY, and Illinois...They could care less about free states. They're the ones who gave Trump the nod for the bumpstock ban. They helped write the GCA of 1968. And the Hughes Amendment (and lied about fighting to repeal it later, after advising Reagan to go ahead and sign it to quell the Democrats), FOPA, the NFA of 1934, helped write Clinton's 1994 crime bill, etc... They've had a helping hand in just about all of it for the last 100 years.
I'd like to learn more about this. Not intending to start an argument, but are they not fighting at all for us, or are they not fighting the fight you'd like to see? Who was arguing the other side of all of your quoted examples and who/how much money was the other side spending? How much did the NRA spend in comparison? I do not at all disagree with you but I have to scratch my head about all of these "facts" that can't be "ACTUALLY" documented with hard data....and I'm not only talking about the NRA.
When Marrion Hammer refers to people who want to see the unconstitutional NFA abolished, as "the enemy within", then the NRA has a problem. When Wayne LaPierre and Chris Cox openly suggested the unconstitutional bumpstock ban to Trump, the NRA has a problem. When they help write every piece of anti-gun legislation for the last 100 years, the NRA has lost its way, and has a VERY serious problem.I'd like to learn more about this. Not intending to start an argument, but are they not fighting at all for us, or are they not fighting the fight you'd like to see? Who was arguing the other side of all of your quoted examples and who/how much money was the other side spending? How much did the NRA spend in comparison? I do not at all disagree with you but I have to scratch my head about all of these "facts" that can't be "ACTUALLY" documented with hard data....and I'm not only talking about the NRA.
Man, looking for my tin foil hat!!
If it were not for the local level support financially through grants and programs there would be ZERO shooting sports left, like any organization they may rub someone wrong over something but given the entirety of what the NRA does on a daily basis from small local towns to the national legislation it's unwise to throw the baby out with the bath water, there is NO ONE who has done more to support gun ownership and shooting sports more than the NRA, PERIOD!
So while I voice a decenting opinion on somethings I refuse to play into the radical BS that's soul purpose is to weeken our voice by divide and conquer our strongest allies!!