My first CA ridgeline drives tacks with factory and tuned every bullet i put in it very easily. 6.5 prc. Not a fan of that stock but who cares if it shoots. My second Ridgeline fft in 7 prc has been troublesome and I can't help but think their quality control is lacking as they bump up production. (They are in all the box stores now) bolt is clunky and very stiff on the downstroke without ammo, more so with ammo, I like the new fft stock, but it feels as though they have cut corners on the finish, and a friend of mine had excess anti seize compound gooping out of the barrel tennon in the action, dimples on the bolt head (they said were hardness testing marks) but mine only had three, his had seven. Not sure what to make of that, but it doesn't instill confidence. Bolt/action is disappointing to the point I'm considering sending it back if possible. It cycles though …barely. It is shooting moa so far but it doesn't show the promise the former model did right out the gate. Will see once load development starts. I feel Christensen has become more a true production rifle than what used to be considered semi-custom. Still good for the price but maybe not as good as it used to be. Time will tell but I'm not as impressed with their new line as I'd hoped I would be. Tighten it up Christensen, the small details matter. Word gets out fast. FWIW weatherby UL bolts are clunky too…