New Brass Offering: Peterson’s 6.5-300 Weatherby & 300 Weatherby

martinakl

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2013
Messages
2,549
Location
SW IDAHO, 83713
Peterson Cartridge is now making brass for:

6.5-300 Weatherby &
300 Weatherby

I emailed them the other day and put a vote/suggestion in for 257 Weatherby and 30-378 Weatherby.

Both are available now at grafs.com.

I don't have a lot of experience with their brass but I will be trying it out soon when I get some load development started on my 300 Win. I purchased the 300 Win "Long" brass for this new rifle. I also have some of their 7mm Rem Mag Brass for a future rifle. I also currently have a backorder on their 280 Ackley brass.

All reviews I've read say Petersons is really good brass. With comparisons to Lapua, or even greater quality.
4195F7EA-084B-4C9E-8B15-5CBE0D27354D.png
3F0AFD24-803E-426D-B54A-8B48203327B6.png
 
Last edited:
WSM shooters....
Some resent chatter on the internet about ADG doing WSM brass this December. I saw a "production schedule" that suggested that might be true (not an official ADG announcement). That said, supposedly it was originally scheduled for this spring.... December sounds a lot like, not in 2021 to me.

everyone keep reaching out to them to show your interest.
 
Last edited:
Peterson Cartridge is now making brass for:

6.5-300 Weatherby &
300 Weatherby

I emailed them the other day and put a vote/suggestion in for 257 Weatherby and 30-378 Weatherby.

Both are available now at grafs.com.

I don't have a lot of experience with their brass but I will be trying it out soon when I get some load development started on my 300 Win. I purchased the 300 Win "Long" brass for this new rifle. I also have some of their 7mm Rem Mag Brass for a future rifle. I also currently have a backorder on their 280 Ackley brass.

All reviews I've read say Petersons is really good brass. With comparisons to Lapua, or even greater quality.
View attachment 274315View attachment 274316
Me to waiting on 280AI brass and for a long time too.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top