Thanks for reminding the poster what kind of site this is. Some folks jut don't get it.
I bet if he could somehow do a study he would discover way more animals are wounded at close range than long range. Do a little thinking. How many inches is three MOA at 600 yards? If a guy buys a new Weatherby 6.5, sticks a Nightforce on it, bore sights it, grabs a couple boxes of ammo, what are the chances of him wounding an animal at long range? Near zero!
Now have the same guy shoot at a deer at 100 yards. If it does not bang flop he thinks he missed and goes off and finds another.