I only FL resize all my 300 Win Mag brass (I use Peterson and Hornady cases, each for a different rifle), and I see no sign of fatigue on my 300 Win Mag cases after many reloads. In other words, I have no problems at all - I only move the shoulder 0.002 in from the fired size.Ok, I don't want to start a food fight or anything, but I am curious what everyone on this forum has to say about this subject. I've seen the Erik Cortina video where he says neck sizing is just passe and so much old lore, and to just full length size for consistency. I've seen some other videos on youtube which sort of cite him and say they agree. However, in my own experience, I haven't so much run the tests to match up one method against another, its just that I learned the hard way you CANNOT full length size belted magnum cartridges past 2-3 times without head case failures. At least I could not. I had 6-7 head case failures on my .300 win mag. which of course is a belted magnum. I even had one lower half stay in the chamber so tight, I had to fill it with earplugs, then fill with an epoxy, and then ram it out from the barrell end.......not fun. So, now I neck size all my new Peterson Brass and have had no more issues or failures and I'm up to 5 times on that brass. Full length sizing at least with my RCBS dies just overworked the brass shoving it back down on the belt, and then the firing would stretch it back out until it failed above the belt in case head separation due to metal fatigue. No one ever told me not to Full length size belted cartridges, no book, no article, nobody told me. I had to learn the hard way.
But, I do full length size my .338 Lapua Magnum brass every 2-4 firings now, and neck size it the rest of the time, just to try to get a little more life out of it. I think just anecdotally I see better group sizes on it when I neck size it. I haven't run any real tests yet. Is there any real scientifically consistent and valid data run by anyone you can point me to who has done exhaustive testing on this subject as to group size vs. method?
Next, I've seen some videos by sdkweber and bolt action reloading on youtube where they ran some tests that seemed to indicate that either 2 thousands or 3 thousands neck tension is optimum for shooting small groups. Is there an accepted standard in the community and if so what is it, and can you again point me to any definitive studies that are scientific, exhaustive, and consistently run that says what the answer is?
One guy says 2 thousands works best, and another seemed to end up with a relationship what shows 1 thousands is worst, 2 thousands is better and 3 thousands is best in a curvelinear line that shows diminished gains at the 3 thousands mark, ie not much to be gained if any past that.
Does anyone have a magic wand or a crystal ball?
I'm just digging in and trying to get it right!
I anneal the cases every single cycle (salt bath annealing), and I also check for case's collet area bulging, which only seems to appear at Hornady brass. I use the Larry Willis Belted Magnum Collet Resizing Die to ensure the lower (and thicker) part of the case is kept in check, and it works like a dream if you follow the easy instructions (https://larrywillis.com/).
Both rifles are consistently under .5 MOA (most of the time under 0.3MOA) at 100m, I use EC tuners on both. I use Hornady ELDX 212gr, Berger VLDH 210gr, and also Berger 245 EOL bullets, H1000 powder, scientific scale, F215M primers, IBI barrels with 1:9 twist rate, MDT chassis.
That Larry Willis die was one of the best investments for me for handloading (in the case of the belted cases), along with the FX powder trickler, the Henderson Precision case trimmer, SAC comparators, 21st Century expanding mandrels, Redding 7 turret press, Forster dies, and the salt bath annealer.