Montana & Arizona

The nice former Congress lady, Gabrielle, from Arizona, remains actively working in politics with her husband, U.S. Navy Captain & astronaut Mark Kelley (D) in an effort to capture the U.S. Senate seat in Arizona. Gabrielle, who displays her sad condition, is utilized by Mark to attract those voters who are sympathetic to victims of gun violence. This normalizes and makes more acceptable, accelerated gun control, supported by husband Mark, a U.S. Navy Captain (military) and astronaut. This certainly, measures up to exploitation of an attack by an evil lunatic criminal

Steve Scalise, a conservative Republican, has never waivered on his support of our Second Amendment despite suffering from horrible injuries.

Cancer has no connection with gun control.

Never said there was any connection between cancer and gun control. I pointed out he similarities between reactions to life changing events and that she is in no way a hypocrite. When people have heart attacks, they have a tendency to change their eating habits as well as the exercise habits. Some even go as far as to harass the people they care about to do the same. Just to clarify, I am not saying there is a connection between heart attacks and gun control. Just similarities in reactions to life changing events.

The former congresswoman has received a traumatic brain injury as a result of being shot in the head and is unable to perform the duties of her former elected position. She works with her husband in a limited fashion much the same way James Brady worked with his wife after he was shot.
 
Same comparison still applies

Of course it does just like every other parent that lost a child in s school shooting or in inner city gang violence. You said most blame the person and and not the weapon. I don't know that anyone soley blames the firearm. In some cases they blame the system for allowing people to have firearms that shouldn't or perhaps the mother that thought it was a good idea to give her mentally ill son an ar15 in the case of Sandy Hook. The relatives of the victims believe that had the perpetrator not had access to a firearm, their loved one would be still alive. They aren't necessarily wrong. They could have been killed with something else but the probability that they would have been killed is lowered significantly.

As stated before, I have sympathy for these people. I disagree with their solution to the problem. Banning "Assault Rifles" will not accomplish anything. Mass shootings will still occur which will give them a reason to go after more laws which will not accomplish anything other than adding more restrictions on law abiding citizens, and they will continue to go after more and so on and so on never addressing the real issues.
 
I'm a lifetime Arizonan. I honor Kelly's service, but not his politics. He got caught trying to show how easy it was to buy an AR and was denied the sale. Cheap political tricks is the common theme regarding the paperwork gauntlet to receive a firearm.
No way he gets my vote.
McSally will get it.
We definitely don't need more liberal socialists here in Az. I'm fourth generation Az, have never seen so much turmoil stirred up by the left. Never thought I'd see burning and looting in this state. Kelly's political ads started aggressively catering to the far left, now we see him calmly talking to seniors and declaring he will be bipartisan. McSally gets my family's vote.
 
Liberal, self aggrandizing politicians such as Mark Kelly & Steve Bullock appear to believe our 2nd amendment (shall not be infringed) is only advisory and insist on negating it and working around it by deception and exploiting various tragic and emotion acquiring events such as horrific shootings resulting in permanent sadness, grief, and suffering.

Our right to self protection is a God given right and the 2nd Amendment reinforces that right.

Want to see tragic stuff - Auschwitz, Cambodia, KKK USA - extermination and/or suppression of politically undesirable groups
 
Really? Ask the parents of the children killed at Sandy Hook?
Seriously? There are so many things wrong with your statement that it's ridiculous.

There are 10 identifiable families from the Sandy Hook incident that are suing Remington and there are thousands of people in the United States that have been shot that aren't suing the gun manufacturer. So your implication that it's common for people to blame the gun is absolutely false. You, like so many people, base your opinions on your emotions rather than facts.
 
Seriously? There are so many things wrong with your statement that it's ridiculous.

There are 10 identifiable families from the Sandy Hook incident that are suing Remington and there are thousands of people in the United States that have been shot that aren't suing the gun manufacturer. So your implication that it's common for people to blame the gun is absolutely false. You, like so many people, base your opinions on your emotions rather than facts.

They may not be suing the gun manufacturers but many of them are pro gun control and want change. Is that blaming the gun or perhaps the system which allows firearms to fall into the hands of people who should not have them? In all actuality, my opinions expressed on here are the least emotion based opinions posted.
 
jbs2014 put lots of effort into his post - I like it and agree.

The attack on our 2nd Amendment in Montana continues with the lady congressional candidate (D) who recently equated AR 15's as "machine guns". At times I hunt rodents with my AR15 and have plans to shoot called yotes with it.

Lots of enthusiastic AR activity at our local range indicating much resistance to banning them.

Centuries ago 1000's of my kind in Europe were killed in one day by enraged mobs (sort of like Antifa) thus my affinity for the 2nd.
Thank you

I had forgotten about Kathleen Williams and the threat she poses to our constitutional rights. As I understand it of all the candidates she faced in her party's primary she was the worst as far a the Second Amendment goes. And from what I have read she is one of the green environmental extremists that would also do anything she could to reduce hunting in the state. She is so rotten she deserves her own thread.
 
I had a brief but pleasant telephone chat with Kathy (D) and expressed my opinions. Kathy did not seem to be disturbed about my opinions and preferred not to argue but I was able to detect Kathy's steely and determined resolve to prevail no matter what - like velvet gloves.
 
Kathy's last ad includes Kathy with a small group of her lady friends. all attired in hunting garb and holding shotguns, posing by a barbed wire fence next to a big field - apparently they are about to shoot some birds ("been hunting for 20 years"). From this ad I am able to see that Kathy is into "Montana Values" which includes hunting.

Would there be an element of hypocrisy should an inspection of their ammo reveal lead shot?

Would Kathy's brand of environmentalism ban lead core bullets, reduce access on public by banning motor vehicles, restrict camping on public lands, restrict hunting on large blocks of public lands for abstract reasons, promote a "hands off" forest management policy to enable bigger and more destructive wild fires then blame "climate change caused by CO2", and other "sound good" stuff like return to Paris Climate Accord and reach into the Security & Exchange Commission for investment activities.

Would Kathy be a tool of Nancy and Chuck to gradually increase restrictions of our shooting sports and gun rights under the guise of environmentalism?

Would Kathy assist in turning Montana into some California type state under Nancy's direction?

I will vote for Matt.

Possibly, coyotes might have increased rights as per the anthropomorphism stuff that makes the yotes similar to politicians.
 
Kathy's last ad includes Kathy with a small group of her lady friends. all attired in hunting garb and holding shotguns, posing by a barbed wire fence next to a big field - apparently they are about to shoot some birds ("been hunting for 20 years"). From this ad I am able to see that Kathy is into "Montana Values" which includes hunting.

Would there be an element of hypocrisy should an inspection of their ammo reveal lead shot?

Would Kathy's brand of environmentalism ban lead core bullets, reduce access on public by banning motor vehicles, restrict camping on public lands, restrict hunting on large blocks of public lands for abstract reasons, promote a "hands off" forest management policy to enable bigger and more destructive wild fires then blame "climate change caused by CO2", and other "sound good" stuff like return to Paris Climate Accord and reach into the Security & Exchange Commission for investment activities.

Would Kathy be a tool of Nancy and Chuck to gradually increase restrictions of our shooting sports and gun rights under the guise of environmentalism?

Would Kathy assist in turning Montana into some California type state under Nancy's direction?

I will vote for Matt.

Possibly, coyotes might have increased rights as per the anthropomorphism stuff that makes the yotes similar to politicians.
And let's not forget that Kathy also supports a ban on Semi Autos as well. She forgets that the Second Amendment was never about duck hunting.
 
Here is more on Mark Kelly and his intent to ban semi autos

here is the video link from Project Veritas



It pretty much shows that our enemies from " Every Town for Gun Safety" and the Mark Kelly campaign are collaborating.

We cannot let these buckets of pigs vomit anywhere near the Senate so please get out and vote and get other gun owners out as well. Our Second Amendment rights depend on it.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 5 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top