It would. But what are you going to do with the ones you deemed "out of spec"?Not arguing here. Just a question. Should sorting the bullets by measuring from the base to the ogive help in this regard?
But seating stems do not seat off the ogive. They seat down from the point. And if your BTO varies, it is not giving you a true measurement from the ogive which is where the bullet contacts the lands.It most certainly will. One of the advantages of the Lee seater is you can remove the seater stem and use it along with your vernier to measure the CBTO
No, it won't.Should sorting the bullets by measuring from the base to the ogive help in this regard?
This is one of the MOST IMPORTANT aspects of consistent seating and distance to lands affecting outcomes.That stem datum is then affected by ogive radius, and there is a measure for this that helps with consistent seating:
Thought maybe people might be interested in the link to this tool. Looks like Bob has it on sale for $250.00.No, it won't.
Base to ogive (BTO) is base length + bearing length + high ogive datum.
The only part of this related to CBTO is ogive datum, as affected by ogive radius.
Seating stems do contact ogives (the ogive is the entire bullet nose), pushing at their own datum.
That stem datum is then affected by ogive radius, and there is a measure for this that helps with consistent seating:
It's a Bob Green Comparator (BGC).
Seating stems contact low on ogives for the steepest angle to push against. An angle too shallow (higher on the ogive) would wedge too much.
There is 'some' wedging anyway which varies with seating force, and this is reduced through stem bedding.
But consistent and moderate to light seating force leads to less seating variance.
I qualify ogives with a BGC, match pre-seating forces with an instrumented mandrel die, and my stems are bedded to specific bullet.
I always measure CBTO, with every round, and it's rare that I need to go back and adjust the micrometer with re-seating.