rscott5028
Well-Known Member
Buffalobob wasn't berating Rich IMO. He was simply making a valid point that there is a difference between facts and beliefs or assumptions.
We don't know what the bullet did because we don't have the bullet or the elk. Had any of us been there spotting, we still wouldn't know for sure unless we recovered the elk.
We do know that he was hit because there was blood. We could make inferences about lungs etc depending on the color of the blood, froth, etc.
Anything more than that is an assumption or a SWAG at best.
As for the guys on TV.... most aren't that good and they do lots of editing.
-- richard
We don't know what the bullet did because we don't have the bullet or the elk. Had any of us been there spotting, we still wouldn't know for sure unless we recovered the elk.
We do know that he was hit because there was blood. We could make inferences about lungs etc depending on the color of the blood, froth, etc.
Anything more than that is an assumption or a SWAG at best.
As for the guys on TV.... most aren't that good and they do lots of editing.
-- richard