Many still don't believe in the whole Pre-historic earth period.
Mark.
If one truly searches the Bible and does not take to it your preconceived ideas, wherever they may come from (origins science so-called, etc.) and let the inspired Word of God speak for itself, you will not come away thinking there is much of a 'pre-historic' time period. Certainly not billions of years. A strict reading of the text would reveal only a few days before man was created, so if by pre-historic, you mean those few days, then I would agree.
So, is there evidence, biblical or otherwise for this claim? Yes, and I believe it to be much more coherent than that for the claim of the 'billions and billions of years' (as Carl Sagan used to love to say--where is Carl spending eternity?).
I've stated that you can't logically take just bits and pieces of the bible as that destroys the whole message of the bible. Why then if you destroy the Bible with your thinking you've taken to it, would then then say that, well, this part and this part are still true.
Why belive ANY of it at that point? I sure wouldn't. That just doesn't make any sense. It's not rational. Either you accept it or you don't. And there is not reason not to accept it just like it is.
For instance, if one tries to mix the idea of evolution and the Bible, you quickly run up against major biblical problems, not the least of which is the idea of millions of years of death and dying
before even the creation of man and certainly after as well. God clearly states that his creation was perfect before Adam and Eve sinned in Genesis. Does death and dying sound like a perfect creation? What kind of God would call that perfect? That's a stretch. And, even more to the point, what is the world to be 'restored' to mentioned in Acts 3:21. Millions of years of death and dying before the fall of man, Adam and Eve's first sin? For many more biblical points on this see:
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-c026.html
Some people aren't concerned about questions of evidence, etc. But people like me are. And I've spent quite a bit of time over the years studying this. Can I really trust that the Bible is truly the inspired Word of God, written by men moved by the Holy Spirit to do so? Yes.
What is the alternative? Beliving that man has all the answers? How many mistakes do you make everyday? If you make as many as I do, I surely wouldn't want the standard to be what I think it right. That is a faith that many people have, but a pretty lousy faith.
Am I really going to trust in myself (man) or in a perfect, holy, loving, just God?
Here are just a few topics to get started on relating to geology alone.
From answersingenesis.org:
Answers in Genesis - Creation, Evolution, Christian Apologetics
General Geology topics
What geological evidence in our world today supports events mentioned in the Bible, such as a global flood?
- Assessing Creationist Stratigraphy with Evidence from the Gulf of Mexico (Semi-Technical)
- Australia's Burning Mountain
- The case of the "missing" geologic time (in Grand Canyon)
- A classic tillite reclassified as a submarine debris flow (Technical)
- Can Flood geology explain thick chalk layers?
- Canyon creation
- Canyon in six days!
- Creating opals
- Deposits Remaining from the Genesis Flood: Rim Gravels in Arizona (off-site, Technical, CRSQ)
- Devil's Tower Formation (ICR Acts and Facts article)
- Diamonds—evidence of explosive geological processes
- Dinosaur National Monument (ICR Impact article)
- Flood Geology of the Crimean Peninsula
Part I: Tavrick Formation (off-site, Technical, CRSQ)
- Grand Canyon
- Grand Canyon limestone: fast or slow deposits?
- Grand Canyon limestones (Semi-Technical, ICR Impact)
- Grand Canyon: Startling evidence for Noah's Flood
- Huge boulder shows power of Flood
- Iceland's recent "mega-flood"
- Kodachrome Basin State Park: Where Can We See Young-Earth Evidence? (ICR BTG 211a)
- La Brea Tar Pits, part 1, part 2, part 3 (off-site, Semi-Technical, CRSQ)
- The Lesson of Surtsey
- Microscopic diamonds confound geologists (Semi-Technical)
- Mt Isa Metal Deposits
- Mt St Helens & Catastrophism (Semi-Technical, ICR Impact)
- Niagara Falls and the Bible
- No Slow and Gradual Erosion
- Oil and Flood Geology (ICR Impact article)
- The Polystrate Trees and Coal Seams of Joggins Fossil Cliffs (off-site, ICR Impact)
- Recent Rapid Uplift of Today's Mountains (ICR Impact article)
- Rock Layers Folded, Not Fractured
- Salty saga
- Sand Transported Cross Country
- Stone Mountain Georgia: A Creation Geologist's Perspective (off-site, Technical, CRSQ)
- The story that won't be told (about the Lake Missoula flood)
- The Tertiary Stratigraphy Surrounding Americus, Georgia:
Evidence in Support of the Young-Earth Flood Framework (off-site, Technical, CRSQ)
- Tuluman—A Test of Time
- Transcontinental Rock Layers
- Uluru and Kata Tjuta: Testimony to the Flood
- Warped earth
- Were the huge Columbia River basalts formed during the Flood? (ICR Acts and Facts article)
How were the Earth's coal beds formed? Does coal formation take a long time?
How were limestone caves formed? Does cave formation take a long time?
Do stalagmites and stalactites take a long time to form?
Is there evidence that rocks don't take a long time to form?
How can many fine layers of rock be formed very quickly?
How can the earth be relatively young (thousands of years old), if dating methods produce dates that are millions of years old?
Are there other geological evidences that show the earth is not millions of years old?
Are fossils proof of millions of years? Why does the evolutionary "geologic column" claim the Earth is millions of years old?
See also:
--------------------
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-c026.html