I received a PM about this Gunwerks video
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jX7dcl_ERNs, and asked why I don't correct for Coriolis until past 1000 yards. I didn't want to respond with anything incorrect (and it also may inspire good conversation) so I am bringing it to the thread for everyone to see the responses.
My initial thought was: to start with they may be using the term "Coriolis effect" incorrectly in the video. I have been taught and so I believe that Coriolis effects the horizontal (right/left) displacement of a bullet's POI from it's intended, while the term Eotvos effect is what happens to it's vertical POI. So I don't associate vertical POI changes to Coriolis, only right and left.
Now as for what I consider Coriolis (right/left), it all depends on your latitude (distance from the equator). At 1000 yards, @ my approx 35 degree latitude, the difference in right impact (northern hemisphere) is less than one "click" on my 1/4 moa and 1/10 mil adjustments. At 1500 yards the difference shows to be a little more than that one "click" with the moa scopes and almost exactly 1/10 mil or one full "click" with my mil based scopes.
If I were to go "up" considerably on the map to say Ft. Severn, Ontario Canada to a latitude of about 56 degrees, then the values go up about 50%. So that almost 1/4 moa "click" @ 1000 becomes a "click", and the a little more than a 1/4 moa "click" becomes basically 1/2 moa @ 1500 yards.
To get these numbers I just sat down and punched different latitudes and azimuth of fire into my Ballistics app and turned on Coriolis. I put in 0 degrees like on the equator, 35 degrees for where I'm currently located and then 56 degrees for the top of Canada just to see the differences. On top of that I input 0, 90, 180, and 270 degrees azimuth of fire for each of these to account for the vertical as well. This, to me, is what most folks consider Coriolis and what I consider Coriolis and Eotvos. Maybe folks just combine the two to simplify, or I'm just flat out wrong!?