Fair enough, that's my feelings on the 6.5 creedmore. Doesn't matter it's merits or the solid arguments in favor.... free or not I'll pass.
Back on subject.
In early grad school we took a course prepping for our thesis. Basically we picked any subject we were passionate about and practiced the mechanism of narrowing down subject towards a thesis. In my case it ended with me chopping down a couple 270 wsm barrels with a chop saw and shooting a myriad of bullets and powders. Another fellow in the class was also a rifle looney, he did initial "literature review" on scouring the forums to answe the question of what's "overbore". Basically he was trying to answer the question, at one point do you run into harder to source or overcome quirks.
Idea was a 7 rum does just fine in what at the time was a relatively normal length (24 to 26 inch) barrel, but our own effort with a 6.5 rum and threads we found on 25 rum or similar capacity cartridges indicated the need for 30 inch barrels, and we're limited at the time to botique bullets and one or two powders.
This is dated info, as a lot has changed since 2010 in powders and sleek bullets... well that and it rely on accuracy of data mined from forums in the early 2000s.
Rum class cartridge seemed to need longer barrels, limited powder options around. 277. The wsm/saum/rcm gets hard to work with below .257. The then popular 284 based wildcats did alright to 6mm but forays to .223 need a long tube, finicky choice of bullets and powder.
Now obviously folks have gone more overbore with all those categories, but they really don't pencil unless your launching heavy for caliber bullets in longer than average tubes and you have prodigious quantities of powder with wet sawdust burn rates.