<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><HR>
I received an email from Chris Gilchrest who is an IOR scope distributor. I guess Chris read my post on the issues I encountered with trying to get my IOR scope repaired. Chris then called me after we exchanged a few emails.
After listening to the problems with the scope tube diameter and what I went through with trying get my scope repaired, he agreed to look into and see if there was anything he could do. He made no promises, just gave me his word he would look into it.
I appreciate the fact that he would call and discuss it and then after getting all the facts, agreed to look into it. These are the type of individuals I enjoy doing business with. Hopefully he can get the problem rectified and correct. If not, he at least went out of his way to try to help.
I'll keep everyone posted as to the out come.
Thanks Chris for taking the time to talk and work with me.
Jeff Harmon
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
It's people like you who make this a great place to visit... I like reading actual results of products... from what I have gathereddd, those IOR are some very good scopes for optics...
my only problem is, as good as they might be, why take a chance... I'd rather buy a Leupold with less great optics, and be bale to have it fixed...
It sounds to me like the IOR people make a good product, but when they mess something up do not want to take responsablity for it...
making a scope that is had great optics isn't going to do any good if the tube is not up to specs, great optics and a 31mm tube is still a piece of junk... never going to go one right, without binding...
They have to be accountable for a poor products...
Sounds like the IOR people have a serious attitude problem...
I'll NEVER buy any of there products...
Leupold I'll buy... good service... they make a great reliable scope, but I'll admit they need to get out of the 1980's and upgrade thier optics to the 21 century.. maybe offer 57-60mm objectivs ON A RIFLE SCOPE, not just a spotting scope..
Then we will not have to look at NF and others as a "better" alternative
scott