Hunting with the Lapua Scenar bullet (muzzle velocity above 3000fps)

M Rosslee

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2016
Messages
64
Location
South Africa
Good day all,

Some observations from the Dark Continent (haha).

I have been burning to test the effect of the 90gr Lapua Scenar projectile in my .243 Winchester chambered rifle (barrel length is 22" with 1:10" twist) on vermin species (jackal) and small/medium-sized, soft-skinned game (antelope).

I assisted in some black back jackal cleansing/culling (similar to your coyote) and some blesbuck removal off of a friend's farm this weekend.

The rifle fires these (6mm) 90gr hollow point boat tail match bullets at 0.25 (1/4) MOA at 200m at a muzzle velocity of 3100fps.

The first three kills were black backed jackal at ranges between 150m and 300m. I noted devastating wounds to the shoulder/chest area indicating that the projectiles had expanded and that the shock wave combined with bullet expansion offered 3-4" wound channels.

I also noted that the rifle, when zeroed at 200m did not require more than a fist's height in correction out to 300m.

I was using a silencer and the impact report was solid on all three jackal. Indicating that I drove the bullet into the real thick stuff (shoulder bones).

Take it or leave it, but as a varminting bullet I would never change from the Lapua Scenar again... Offering a beautiful flat trajectory and match precision and accuracy on small targets.

It then came down to the blesbuck test.

The first big ram was at around 300-320m and I corrected my elevation by about a hand's height (5-6") above the heart-line (lower third of the body).

I squeezed the shot off and the impact report was fantastic, the antelope's reaction even more so. The ram ran about 20 yards before expiring. The shot hit him on the shoulder and exited just behind the shoulder on the opposite side. I was impressed with the dramatic effect on target impact.

When gutting the animal upon return to camp, the following was observed:

1. The entrance wound/hole was tiny (6mm) with a Mentos sized exit wound behind the opposite shoulder;

2. The lungs had burst, torn and collapsed from the hydrostatic shock and the heart showed a large wound entrance in the upper ventricles and the exit from the heart looked like mince meat... A CLEAR INDICATOR OF PROJECTILE EXPANSION AND HIGH VELOCITY;

3. Funnily enough, there was no remarkable meat damage nor hydrostatic shock damage to the soft tissue (even on entrance).

The next day, a friend shot a young blesbuck ram i the eye at approximately 230m with my rifle. The bullet did not maintain its course and clearly burst as there were several exit wounds under the muzzle/snout and out of the opposite side's cheek, the hemorrhaging was severe as the head had swollen to twice its normal size between shooting and arriving at the expiration point. The young buck went down like lightning hit him.

Another young ram was shot that same day on the shoulder at around 150m (quite a bit closer than the previous shoulder shot) with my rifle. The effect was less dramatic this time and in the name of ethics and carcass recovery a second shot was put into the animal's upper neck (which was shattered by the small bullet). The first shot had actually again spectacularly exploded the heart and caused violent collapsing and bursting of the lungs, the kill was just not as quick as the big ram I had shot before. The bullet had not exited but rather fragmented into three small pieces which all came to rest under the opposing shoulder's skin. The meat damage here was a bit more intense, which is without a doubt range related (the energy and shock wave of a projectile moving at 3100fps at the muzzle striking its target at 150m is self explanatory).

I hope this is of value. Please see the attached pics described above.

Please do share your experience with the bullet and feel free to comment with similar experiences and observations.

I would be weary of shooting anything bigger than small/medium thin-skinned game with this caliber choice and bullet weight.

I also cannot comment on the reliability in respect of expansion of this projectile. I must however in closing say that I was chuffed with its performance.

Regards
M Rosslee
 

Attachments

  • Big ram's heart 300m.jpg
    Big ram's heart 300m.jpg
    232.7 KB · Views: 2,096
  • Small Ram's Heart at 150m.jpg
    Small Ram's Heart at 150m.jpg
    285.6 KB · Views: 2,036
  • Jackal 1.jpg
    Jackal 1.jpg
    361.5 KB · Views: 685
  • Jackal 2.jpg
    Jackal 2.jpg
    366.9 KB · Views: 619
  • Rifle used.jpg
    Rifle used.jpg
    117.5 KB · Views: 690
  • Big ram taken at 300m.jpg
    Big ram taken at 300m.jpg
    92 KB · Views: 725
Good report on the Scenario's terminal effects. Thanks.

I have shot a few animals with 155r Scenarios launched at 2885fps from a .308. A decent Whitetail buck, a couple of pigs and a Coyote. It was my impression that when compared with Berger Hunting VLDs, the Scenars must be a good bit harder in construction. The animals I shot with the Scenars didn't have nearly the internal trauma as those shot with the Hunting VLDs. They ran farther, and left little to no blood trail. One thing I have really enjoyed about the Scenars is they are easier to get to shoot well than just about any bullet I have tried. I think when launched at higher MVs like you did, they are probably a great option, but at .308 velocities, I prefer the Hunting VLDs.

John
 
thanks for the informative report, I think it exemplifies the strengths and weaknesses of a 6mm Scenar for varmints vs game
 
The Scenar is defiitely a flying bomb at that velocity which is exactly what you want on varmints unless of course you plan to take hides. I would not use them on game however as they are too frangible to suit me.

I have tried them in several different calibers but was less than satisfied with the accuracy and moved on.

Fortunately there are lots of choices available.

Living in the RSA though I would think the Peregrine Bullets would be a better and certainly cheaper alternative?
 
I ran some bullistic gel testing on the 139 Scenar the other day. For white tail I would not choose that bullet as my first pick. I do think with good shot placement it would work just fine it just wouldn't be my first choice or second choice. I was pushing them at right about 2700 at the muzzle at 100 yards the bullet completely came apart but not right away it entered for 4-5" before compete failure which when it did happen happened very quickly. I think on varmints it would be a good choice up to coyotes maybe deer sized game. I also tested 140 Amax which was accually pretty good maybe 50% weight retention of the core very fast exspantion much faster than the Scenar and had a core that could drive deep if needed. The Hornady 143 VLD-X where hands down the best hunting bullet of those three I tested imo
 
I ran some bullistic gel testing on the 139 Scenar the other day. For white tail I would not choose that bullet as my first pick. I do think with good shot placement it would work just fine it just wouldn't be my first choice or second choice. I was pushing them at right about 2700 at the muzzle at 100 yards the bullet completely came apart but not right away it entered for 4-5" before compete failure which when it did happen happened very quickly. I think on varmints it would be a good choice up to coyotes maybe deer sized game. I also tested 140 Amax which was accually pretty good maybe 50% weight retention of the core very fast exspantion much faster than the Scenar and had a core that could drive deep if needed. The Hornady 143 VLD-X where hands down the best hunting bullet of those three I tested imo
I'm really glad to see such good early reports on the ELD-X. I was a bit concerned when I learned they weren't using the same bonding process as with the interbond but they sure look to be acting like a bonded bullet.
 
thanks for the informative report, I think it exemplifies the strengths and weaknesses of a 6mm Scenar for varmints vs game

I think it gives a good idea of the type of bullet performance to expect from a match-bullet on both varmint and small soft-skinned antelope.

6mm is a fantastic caliber and should not be underestimated but as my old man always says, don't overestimate its capabilities and ballistic characteristics.
 
I think it gives a good idea of the type of bullet performance to expect from a match-bullet on both varmint and small soft-skinned antelope.

6mm is a fantastic caliber and should not be underestimated but as my old man always says, don't overestimate its capabilities and ballistic characteristics.
My friends in Africa shoot the .243 and 6.5x55 on their plains game and varmints and have great success with that pair. Of course these are guys who can flat put it in the right spot every time.

**** poor Placement won't over come Displacement but even with smaller calibers if you have a quality bullet and put it in the right spot you will have a smile on your face after pulling the trigger.gun)
 
The Scenar is defiitely a flying bomb at that velocity which is exactly what you want on varmints unless of course you plan to take hides. I would not use them on game however as they are too frangible to suit me.

I have tried them in several different calibers but was less than satisfied with the accuracy and moved on.

Fortunately there are lots of choices available.

Living in the RSA though I would think the Peregrine Bullets would be a better and certainly cheaper alternative?

Peregrine from my experience is a glorified solid (emphasis on "my experience") with brilliant penetrative qualities but very narrow wounding and slow kills. I had two "failures to expand" on gemsbuck and the wound channel was disappointing leading to quite a long walk after well-placed shots that with any expanding projectile would have been tremendously fast-killing. I have the same to say about Barnes. I'm not a fan of monolythic projectiles and prefer a bonded lead bullet. (See attached expansion failure pic on Peregrine bullet travelling at 2800fps and impact on target at 110y).

The Scenar is also not my choice of hunting bullet but it's target performance is phenomenal with my 243's 22" standard barrel with 1:10" twist (see attached pic on 4 shot group at 120y).

With the .243, for varminting, Lapua Scenar all day and any day. For hunting South African antelope (impala, springbuck, hartebeest and blesuck), I tend to shift towards 100gr Hornady Interlock bullets which may not be the best weight retainers, but expand well and maintain their course whilst travelling through soft tissue.

I typically use Sierra Gamekings on most game here... The bullet expands well and retains good weight on even the toughest thick-skinned antelope/plains game such as bluewildebeest, gemsbuck, waterbuck, eland and zebra. It also has a good ballistic coefficient with its form taken into account. I have mostly good things to say about Sierra, on target and on game impact. And the price is flattering. (See attached Sierra Gameking mushroom after 180gr at 2600fps smashed into a bluewildebeest shoulder - beautiful big wildebeest too).
 

Attachments

  • 4 shot group at 100m.jpg
    4 shot group at 100m.jpg
    36.6 KB · Views: 338
  • Sierra Gameking on BWB.jpg
    Sierra Gameking on BWB.jpg
    124.7 KB · Views: 470
  • 12970478_10209459825556613_1176485078_o.jpg
    12970478_10209459825556613_1176485078_o.jpg
    346.1 KB · Views: 364
  • Peregrine Failure.jpg
    Peregrine Failure.jpg
    69.5 KB · Views: 403
My friends in Africa shoot the .243 and 6.5x55 on their plains game and varmints and have great success with that pair. Of course these are guys who can flat put it in the right spot every time.

**** poor Placement won't over come Displacement but even with smaller calibers if you have a quality bullet and put it in the right spot you will have a smile on your face after pulling the trigger.gun)

Spot on! Well said!
 
I ran some bullistic gel testing on the 139 Scenar the other day. For white tail I would not choose that bullet as my first pick. I do think with good shot placement it would work just fine it just wouldn't be my first choice or second choice. I was pushing them at right about 2700 at the muzzle at 100 yards the bullet completely came apart but not right away it entered for 4-5" before compete failure which when it did happen happened very quickly. I think on varmints it would be a good choice up to coyotes maybe deer sized game. I also tested 140 Amax which was accually pretty good maybe 50% weight retention of the core very fast exspantion much faster than the Scenar and had a core that could drive deep if needed. The Hornady 143 VLD-X where hands down the best hunting bullet of those three I tested imo

"Completely came apart" like this Lapua Scenar I recovered from a blesbuck? (after passing through the breadth of the body and stopping under the skin on the opposite shoulder).
 

Attachments

  • Jacket and core separation.jpg
    Jacket and core separation.jpg
    118.8 KB · Views: 414
Too be honest I would leave target match bullets for paper punching or varmit sized game only but I have not tried the VLD hunting bullet or the A Max yet for deer. I normally use Accubonds, Ballistic Tips, and GameKings mostly for deer sized game.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top