Yeah, I went with ELDx's due to cost as well, as well as BC and after calling them and talking to them on the phone about the design and philosophy of the bullet. My son shoots accubonds in his 270, and he has had good luck so far, but we just started with them this year. I am planning on using BT's for him to practice with, hopefully, we get the same point of impact.
I am glad this was helpful to you, but I am not fully convinced on the ELDX 200's, I am not sure what to think to be honest. I want a round that I can use for deer to elk. One one hand, I've have never had animals (deer, mouflon, goats and now a hog) go down like that...using a 270, a 65 grendel and even a 375 h&h. With this mild 300 load and the ELDX, they went down fast and hard, both at 90 yards and 300, and they were not cns hits.
On the other hand, the holes in the ribs were large, there was a lot of shredded and bloodshot meat, but the actual exits in the skin were small, under the skin, damage was massive. My guess is it expanded back and exited at a near caliber diameter...but not sure. I will say that the hits at 90 and 300 looked pretty much the same as far as bullet performance from what I could see.
So I wonder about expansion, penetration etc on something like an Elk, especially if it has to pass through a shoulder bone or something, especially considering my load is quite mild. Hornady told me it is designed to act like 3 bullets. At close range, it expands, sheds, expands, sheds and then expands again, exiting at a 40-50% weight.
At medium range, it should expand, shed and expand again, exiting at more like a 60-70% weight. At long range, it should just expand and exit with a 80-90% retention. So maybe it is working as it should and would perform the same, not sure.
I am hoping to hear more now that the season is ended. If you hear more please pass it on. I wish I had had more of a chance to do a proper necropsy, but we were rushed so just had to get it done and get on down the road asap.