Hollow Point vs OTM bullets

archanfire

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2016
Messages
175
Location
Missouri
Hello all. I seek an answer to a question that has bothered me long enough. Do Open Tip Match(OTM) rounds perform the same as hollow point rounds (on impact)? Visually they look the same to me, but I've found conflicting answers online and I don't currently have a way to test myself. I have some of each, but would like to know if I can treat them as equals or keep separated for different roles.

As always, I prefer first hand knowledge as I've already found plenty of conflicting arguments online.

Thanks
 
I've never hunted with them, but if you put an OTM and Hunter model bullet side by side, I probably could not tell the difference.
 
Hauge convention inadvertently had a little to do with it even though the US was never a party to it- it caused confusion over "hollow point bullets" so the term "open tip match" was coined.

An otm bullet "isn't designed to open easily on soft tissue at distance" yet a "hollow point" is commonly thought to do so.

It's all semantics--- it doesn't mean that an otm bullet won't expand, it just means it wasn't designed or tested to do so.

Most times an otm bullet has a smaller opening than a hollow point bullet ( but not always)

Otm bullets are designed as match bullets, hunting hollow point bullets are designed and tested for expansion on soft tissue---- many people have found otm bullets to be very good hunting bullets, it's just that the manufacturer never "designed or tested them for expansion"
 
Hello all. I seek an answer to a question that has bothered me long enough. Do Open Tip Match(OTM) rounds perform the same as hollow point rounds (on impact)? Visually they look the same to me, but I've found conflicting answers online and I don't currently have a way to test myself. I have some of each, but would like to know if I can treat them as equals or keep separated for different roles.

As always, I prefer first hand knowledge as I've already found plenty of conflicting arguments online.

Thanks
Yes!
 
OTMs kill with authority. The Berger 6.5mm 130 OTM is probably our most used hunting bullet on deer and pronghorn. From 145 to 771 yards.
I have used the .224 77 OTM, and .308 230 OTM as well. They absolutely crush as well.

They are a little shorter than the Hyb or Elite counterparts of the same weight.

Here are a few examples of the 6.5mm 130 OTM performance.
Entrance @ 145 yds
20230827_121458.jpg

Exit, buck went 0 yards
20230827_121429.jpg


Entrance @ 381 yards
20210814_123553.jpg

Exit, buck went 20 yards
20210814_123349.jpg


260 yard entrance
20200816_193124.jpg

Exit, buck was at a full run, and rolled about 20 yards after impact
20200816_163329.jpg


391 yard shot, buck went 0 yards, exit was similar to above photos.
20190818_161415.jpg


771 yards, buck ran for a bit, maybe 60 yards, but I didn't photo the exit on purpose. It was UGLY. Buck was quartering slightly away, shot was a bit back in the winds, but most definitely very fatal.
20220815_183046.jpg


637 yard shot. On the button on the shoulder. Buck went 0 yards.
20161119_084926.jpg


454 yard shot, buck went 0 yards. Quartering away, shot was at last rib, stopped under hide on offside neck.
20191122_093620.jpg
 
Last edited:
The thing about "The Hague" convention is true. Expanding bullets in warfare is considered bad juju. Hollow point was connected to expanding bullets.

so

Avoidance of the use of the term "hollow point" is true to some extent.

To add to that. I remember having a discussion here or on one of the other LR forums about the construction. Someone sectioned (cut in half) one of each HP vs OTM. The OTM had a much thinner copper jacket. Somewhere in the discussion contact was made with Berger, if memory serves they confirmed it, higher SD.

Berger advertises the OTM for military use.

https://bergerbullets.com/information/lines-and-designs/otm-tactical-bullets/
 
The 6.5mm 130 OTM, used to be called the "130 AR Hybrid". It was designed to be a shorter OAL to run better in an AR length platform to fit is the AR mags.
 
I'll go with "Sometimes" they perform the same or very similar, sometimes the OTM doesn't perform like the "hunting" hollow point!

That said, even hunting hollow points may not perform as advertised. Anything manmade can fail to meet expectations!

My opinion on the "dice roll"…….do ya feel lucky…..well do ya? 😉 memtb
 

Recent Posts

Top