JakeC
Well-Known Member
Do weird things happen when it gets REALLY hot? Or am I undervaluing other variables?
I shot a bullet one day at 3400 fps. 140g absolute hammer with RL 16. Two weeks later the same load in VERY similar conditions shot 3300 fps. A different load in the same rifle shot 2750 the first day and 2680-2715 the second, very different ES than prior. Chronograph was working correctly. There was a slight difference in shade intensity and some difference in the roughness of the ride on the way, but ambient temps were close. I thought. The ammo could have been a max of 10 degrees warmer the first day. Barrel conditions were basically the same. No shots fired in the interim.
First day was real hot. Windy, 100 or better, but then cooled off with oncoming rain during the testing. Chrono at thirteen feet. Second day was also hotter than forecast, conditions were pretty still and about 92-95 with little wind and increasing temperatures. Chrono at 8 feet.
Load B (eld/h4831) had been loaded for a long time, not annealed, and done when I knew less in general. so maybe there was some neck weld soaking up some pressure or something else. It was accurate at 500. Beer can accurate. But slower than before.
Load A (hammer/rl16) had been annealed, loaded, crimped, pulled, resized, reloaded, and recrimped with the same bullets and same powder. And it was 100fps or more different.
Is there a tipping point where the effect of temperature starts to snowball even on temp stable powders? Does shaking ammo because you took the wrong trail and had to jump dunes to get out have an effect? Am I missing something else? Can a cheap digital scale be THAT far off week to week but still produce SD of 5-8 fps? I thought I was going to finalize my rifle loads before I started bowhunting but if I can suddenly add an entire grain or more before pressure then I'm starting over, which is annoying.
Anyone else seen this kind of mess before? Thanks for any thoughts.
I shot a bullet one day at 3400 fps. 140g absolute hammer with RL 16. Two weeks later the same load in VERY similar conditions shot 3300 fps. A different load in the same rifle shot 2750 the first day and 2680-2715 the second, very different ES than prior. Chronograph was working correctly. There was a slight difference in shade intensity and some difference in the roughness of the ride on the way, but ambient temps were close. I thought. The ammo could have been a max of 10 degrees warmer the first day. Barrel conditions were basically the same. No shots fired in the interim.
First day was real hot. Windy, 100 or better, but then cooled off with oncoming rain during the testing. Chrono at thirteen feet. Second day was also hotter than forecast, conditions were pretty still and about 92-95 with little wind and increasing temperatures. Chrono at 8 feet.
Load B (eld/h4831) had been loaded for a long time, not annealed, and done when I knew less in general. so maybe there was some neck weld soaking up some pressure or something else. It was accurate at 500. Beer can accurate. But slower than before.
Load A (hammer/rl16) had been annealed, loaded, crimped, pulled, resized, reloaded, and recrimped with the same bullets and same powder. And it was 100fps or more different.
Is there a tipping point where the effect of temperature starts to snowball even on temp stable powders? Does shaking ammo because you took the wrong trail and had to jump dunes to get out have an effect? Am I missing something else? Can a cheap digital scale be THAT far off week to week but still produce SD of 5-8 fps? I thought I was going to finalize my rifle loads before I started bowhunting but if I can suddenly add an entire grain or more before pressure then I'm starting over, which is annoying.
Anyone else seen this kind of mess before? Thanks for any thoughts.