We usually agree but not on this. My real life data tells me not to step over one to get the other. Hodgdon book data hardly matches my real world data.
In other words, what ever floats your boat.
I agree with you, but In the real world, we can load to whatever velocity we chose and can live with. I quoted the numbers as printed with the same barrel length, same bullet weight and the same chamber pressure.
they gave the numbers I posted.
I have loaded well above the listed pressures and regretted it, so I only quote listed data that is at or below 63,000 PSI for safety and less trouble for the shooter. If I take liberties with loads, I know the outcome and have to live with the results.
I never intend to knock one cartridge over another because they all have there strong points and week points. I only try to show a comparison of the cartridges in their class for the poster to decide.
I have studied most, if not all of the new cartridges and found many
with very little improvements over existing cartridges. Being a wildcatter, I look for the cartridge that shows an advantage in what we already have. And if there are none, I move on. I don't believe in making change just for the sake of making change If there is no benefit.
Bottom line is a person can chose whatever cartridge they want for what ever reason they want as you stated. Only time will tell how good a cartridge is and even some of the best have fallen by the way side for one reason or the other. I still own Some of these and keep them because they do such a good job for what they were intended.
As stated, I just try to compare apples to apples and stay away from my likes and dislikes. I like and respect everyone's opinion and Enjoy
hearing their point.
Thanks. (More coffee needed)
J E CUSTOM